(PMC of Apache projects I mean of course)
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:11 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> Since you wanted to have a smooth and nice cooperation - as a
> courtesy, Is it possible that you explicitly put ASF there and
> obligations that are not valid (especially when you reach out to PM
Since you wanted to have a smooth and nice cooperation - as a
courtesy, Is it possible that you explicitly put ASF there and
obligations that are not valid (especially when you reach out to PMCs
of Airflow projects)?
I think otherwise it puts too much responsibility on individuals to
check what
The wording now basically says that anything listed as an obligation can
be ignored if it conflicts with your organization’s policy requirements. So
that should make it possible for individuals to agree to work with Tidelift
without the PMC agreeing to anything.
That said, I personally have no
I think the door was always open to work with Tidelift by the individuals.
This has never been a problem (and recruiting individual PMC members
by you was never a problem either).
However, yes, I do have a question now. I am actually - as a PMC
member of Apache Airflow interested. You have one of
Hi Jarek,
> I have a question - what exactly do you expect here? What is your ask and
> proposal ? I read the docs and I have not found any action that I or
anyone
> else here could take here - (possibly that's why you did not get any
> response) - I looked at it several days ago but I could not f
