I added some content to the June newsletter. It could use some attention.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/yBKhD
On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 12:26 PM Josh Fischer wrote:
> I changed the structure of the Monthly Moments pages:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/0YyFD
>
> Starter page for J
So let's look at this from the point of view of a small PMC here, say
any of those that have less than 10 committers or so still around
(possibly even with only 3 active PMC members). I don't see how asking
an already overburdened project to bootstrap their own ability to work
on the project fullti
Worth checking.
Seems to be possible for other non-profits with the same regime (see the
list of the hosts there).
I think the big difference here is not that the ASF points to
OpenCollective, but that Open Collective points to ASF as the "host" and
the PMC initiatives point to ASF as "host" when
Hi Jarek,
But I still can't believe this could be legal for the ASF to do. I would love
it to be ok, but right now it's even problematic to even have links to
commercial offerings regarding Apache projects, because that would endanger our
non-profit status. I just can't believe something like t
And a comment - if, and only if ASF could become the Fiscal Host for all
those initiatives and it would be legal from the point of view of the
bylaws of the Foundation, this concern of yours Chris should be
automatically handled:
> I mean with most companies in the Industry, they only work with p
> What does it mean to “enable” marketing? If that’s the same level of
marketing we get at the ASF already, then it’s dead in the water for most
projects.
The best is to show an example here.
This is the initiative I recently supported
https://opencollective.com/devfest-for-ukraine/ (And I hearti
What does it mean to “enable” marketing? If that’s the same level of marketing
we get at the ASF already, then it’s dead in the water for most projects.
—
Matt Sicker
> On May 9, 2022, at 10:22, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I think the non-profit charity aspect definitely would disqualify
> I think the non-profit charity aspect definitely would disqualify the ASF
as being one of these Fiscal Hosts. But in general, it does sound like they
could be something usable, just not using the ASF as Fiscal Host.
I am not sure to be honest. From at least looking at the description of
what Fis
Hi Roman and Jarek,
well the reason I was proposing something new was that I did try to participate
with some of the existing initiatives like Tidelift, but they showed a great
amount of disinterest. It seems as if only the projects big enough are
considered worthy of being supported. The entit
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 4:35 PM me wrote:
>
> Roman, welcome to the party!
LOL! Thanks ;-)
> I think the scope of the risk (in terms of “what”) is fairly well understood.
> Did you also estimate the probability of the risks? (i.e. likelihood?)
IIRC mostly the likelihood.
> Do you mind sharing
Roman, welcome to the party!
I think the scope of the risk (in terms of “what”) is fairly well understood.
Did you also estimate the probability of the risks? (i.e. likelihood?)
Do you mind sharing what the results were of the previous assessment?
From: Roman Shaposhnik
Reply: dev@commu
Very good points Roman. I think it's great to think about it with the
building business "mindset" - this is the only way it can actually succeed.
But maybe we do not have to go this way.
The #1 seems much more attractive and there are other options.
I think Open Collective is as close as it can be
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 6:54 PM me wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: A way to keep the name
>
> I think it's a good idea to make such a fund or simply make sure that
> existing efforts (TAC, Outreachy engagement) have some deliberate and
> conscious actions in this direction - knowing the past associa
Chris, thanks for sort of reviving the old thread I had before the
war: I'm slowly coming back to my more regular Open Source life from
all the craziness of the past two months. Because of that, there's not
much to report back -- but I will share a few points and comment on a
few of yours. Hope thi
14 matches
Mail list logo
