Re: Milestones guidelines

2017-07-10 Thread Leif Hedstrom
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 1:53 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > Hi all, > > yes, I know, the documentation here is lacking (or missing), but here are the > general guidelines for what Milestone to set on a PR. > > Sorry, wrong list … :-/ — leif

Milestones guidelines

2017-07-10 Thread Leif Hedstrom
Hi all, yes, I know, the documentation here is lacking (or missing), but here are the general guidelines for what Milestone to set on a PR. 1) Set it to the current, actively developed, major version. Currently this means v8.0.0. 2) If you think this is a back port candidate, a

Re: Introducing code owners

2017-07-10 Thread Jacob Champion
On 07/10/2017 06:03 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: On 07/07/2017 09:39 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: I think "CODEOWNERS" is too strong a term; they should have been more descriptive with CODEREVIEWERS or the like, since these aren't necessarily owners of a file or project. That might be useful feedback for

Re: Introducing code owners

2017-07-10 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 7/10/2017 1:07 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: Cookie licking is the term I prefer, too. It's very well defined here: http://communitymgt.wikia.com/wiki/Cookie_Licking I had the very nicest employee with one only evil tendency. He loved to squish the cookie dough with the built in patterns so they w

Re: Introducing code owners

2017-07-10 Thread Joan Touzet
Cookie licking is the term I prefer, too. It's very well defined here: http://communitymgt.wikia.com/wiki/Cookie_Licking -Joan - Original Message - From: "Rich Bowen" To: dev@community.apache.org Sent: Monday, 10 July, 2017 9:03:33 AM Subject: Re: Introducing code owners On 07/07/2017

Re: Introducing code owners

2017-07-10 Thread Rich Bowen
On 07/07/2017 09:39 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > I think "CODEOWNERS" is too strong a term; they should have been more > descriptive with CODEREVIEWERS or the like, since these aren't > necessarily owners of a file or project. That might be useful feedback > for github, but since they've already r

Re: Solutions.Hamburg: Invitation to provide ApacheContent

2017-07-10 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Justin, Well there has been quite some interest to speak, but what I’m talking about is to sort of plan a schedule for which we would then try to get people from the corresponding Projects to speak. I don’t want to dictate a schedule. As I mentioned before, the audience there is quite entry

Re: Solutions.Hamburg: Invitation to provide ApacheContent

2017-07-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I am willing to do a lot of the work for this, but definitely not all of it. > So, if there are people willing to help, please step forward. Otherwise I’ll > just contact the guys from that conference and cancel this project. I assume at this point is just getting enough people to put up

Re: Solutions.Hamburg: Invitation to provide ApacheContent

2017-07-10 Thread Christofer Dutz
Ok so this is a final mail from my side. I am willing to do a lot of the work for this, but definitely not all of it. So, if there are people willing to help, please step forward. Otherwise I’ll just contact the guys from that conference and cancel this project. Chris Am 03.06.17, 18:22 schr