Hi Shayak
Am 12/6/2016 um 8:22 AM schrieb Shayak Sadhu:
Hello,
I want to contribute to any project for Apache Foundation.
Nice, maybe you can tell us a bit more about your skills and your
interest. It's easier to find a project
Regards, Raphael
-
Hi Shayak,
Please read our "Get Involved" section on our website.
https://www.apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html
Another starting point is the "Help wanted" section.
https://helpwanted.apache.org/
Best Regards
Johannes
#
web: http://www.jgepp
Hello,
I want to contribute to any project for Apache Foundation.
Regards,
Shayak Sadhu
I would like to help out with the task listed at
https://helpwanted.apache.org/task.html?3c264f0f
Ted Liu
I think I agree with both of you...
On 12/05/2016 09:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
I have seen way too many metrics being misused to justify the wrong actions
...measuring the wrong thing at the wrong time or in the wrong way can
be *extremely* harmful, yes...
On 12/05/2016 01:07 PM, Daniel Gr
So ... stepping back a bit here. Are you saying that even attempting to
measure outcomes is harmful, because we might draw the wrong conclusions?
This is a completely new notion to me.
You say:
"I am reluctant to simply collect some data because I am missing a clear
question what we are trying t
On 05.12.16 17:54, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 12/05/2016 07:41 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>>> Or, at the very least, can we make a commitment to track this data going
forward?
>> Let me play the devil's advocate here: What for?
>>
>> GSoC is completely free for the ASF (on the contrary, we even
On 12/05/2016 09:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> On 05.12.16 17:45, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/05/2016 07:41 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
Or, at the very least, can we make a commitment to track this data going
> forward?
>>> Let me play the devil's advocate here: What for?
>>>
>>> GSoC is c
On 05.12.16 17:45, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 12/05/2016 07:41 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>>> Or, at the very least, can we make a commitment to track this data going
forward?
>> Let me play the devil's advocate here: What for?
>>
>> GSoC is completely free for the ASF (on the contrary, we even
Hi at all
I'm finaly here too. I think, moast of you know me ;-) But the way to
this list wasn't so easy. I'm honest, i diden't know about comdev util
Roman point me to the ML. Then I searched for the subscribe link, and
faild. Well I know how to compose the subscribe adress for the ML, but
w
So, since this thread seems to have been perceived as "justify your
existence, you layabouts!" let me rephrase, in the hopes of being a
little more constructive. Apologies to any who took my question as an
attack or accusation. It was neither.
Do we have a comprehensive list of project/particpant
On 12/05/2016 01:08 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On 5 December 2016 at 17:07, Jacob Champion wrote:
>> Perhaps a bit off-topic for this thread in particular, but in all
>> seriousness, I like this idea a lot. As you've noted, older projects and
>> established developers don't always know whi
On 5 December 2016 at 17:07, Jacob Champion wrote:
> Perhaps a bit off-topic for this thread in particular, but in all
> seriousness, I like this idea a lot. As you've noted, older projects and
> established developers don't always know which parts of their projects need
> "newbie improvement" --
As has been discussed elsewhere, we don't have a clear idea of what
we're here for. I believe we need to fix that.
Why This Matters
1) So that we know how to ask for help
This matters because people *flock* to us saying "I want to help", and
in pretty much every case our response is "Great! Help
On 12/05/2016 08:59 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> I disagree with the need for comdev to have a strategy.
I'd like to respond to just this remark.
ComDev has a goal. It is stated in the resolution that created the PMC.
That goal is:
to establish a Project Management Committee charged with
Yes, this would be hugely helpful.
This page - http://community.apache.org/gsoc- should be inward-facing as
well as outward facing. It should tell projects what they should expect
to spend (time, effort, not necessarily money) and what the benefits are
likely to be.
If that's anecdotal, great.
I
Why not Zoidberg?
If someone wants to gather stats, that's great - if someone wants to
gather stories etc, that is also great. One doesn't exclude the other,
and considering we have nothing at the moment, anything is a step up.
With regards,
Daniel
On 12/05/2016 06:18 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> IMO,
IMO, rather than gathering statistics, it would be better to gather
stories, tips and advice. It doesn't seem to me that statistics would be
helpful, folks just need to know that it can have great benefits or great
cost and some ideas of the reasons why. Even if it hasn't been helpful in
the past
On 12/05/2016 08:15 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
Perhaps ComDev can act like a prpject visitor. (Not auditor or inspector!)
"No one expects the ComDev Inquisition!!"
We can make a wiki page with a randomised list of all ASF projects, a quick
checklist (smaller than maturity model) and just
Hi Rich,
Do you prefer to see cumulative statistics or PMC wise? With a small effort, I
can get detailed statistics from Apache Airavata. GSoC has been great for the
project and is one of the primary sources to induct fresh blood. We have a
decent retention rate, students have stayed around, ea
Nobody is suggesting we have a 10 year plan with milestones and
deliverables. I'm suggesting that when we do something under the heading
of "community development" we have an obligation to make some attempt to
measure it to determine if it actually moves us in that direction.
Nobody is saying that
On 12/05/2016 07:41 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>> Or, at the very least, can we make a commitment to track this data going
>> > forward?
> Let me play the devil's advocate here: What for?
>
> GSoC is completely free for the ASF (on the contrary, we even get a small
> amount for every accepted
> st
On 12/05/2016 07:37 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> What money are we putting into this?
I have no idea. That would be part of the data that I, as a member,
would really like to know.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Uli
>
> On 03.12.16 23:16, Rich Bowen wrote:
>> So, this question was asked several weeks ago, an
On 12/05/2016 07:41 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>> Or, at the very least, can we make a commitment to track this data going
>> > forward?
> Let me play the devil's advocate here: What for?
>
> GSoC is completely free for the ASF (on the contrary, we even get a small
> amount for every accepted
> st
Perhaps something for ComDev is to work on engagement with software
developers who don't currently consider themselves part of any ASF
community, but use our software without contributing (much) back.
These are generally more experienced than GSOC students, and while they
won't have as much contin
I think GSOC is very valuable, both for the students and the ASF projects
that participate.
Even if a student does not hang around after GSOC (were they made
committer?) it is still good for communities to get fresh drive and ideas,
and ask questions which established committers might not have tho
On 12/05/2016 03:46 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Ulrich Stärk wrote on 12/5/16 9:27 AM:
>> On 05.12.16 14:30, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>> On 12/05/2016 01:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> ...snip...
>>> But this goes beyond GSoC in my mind. We should be looking at ALL ComDev
>>> projects and evaluate what we
Ulrich Stärk wrote on 12/5/16 9:27 AM:
> On 05.12.16 14:30, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> On 12/05/2016 01:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
...snip...
>> But this goes beyond GSoC in my mind. We should be looking at ALL ComDev
>> projects and evaluate what we want to keep, what isn't working, and what
>> needs
On 05.12.16 14:30, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 12/05/2016 01:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>> On 03.12.16 23:16, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>> So, this question was asked several weeks ago, and, so far, we have no
>>> statistics. I wonder if, now that there appears to be some interest
>>> around GSoC 2017 starti
On 12/05/2016 02:59 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> ...The task of ComDev is developing community. If we don't have any data or
>> interest in acquiring such to show that this is in fact helping towards
>> that, then we should consid
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> ...The task of ComDev is developing community. If we don't have any data or
> interest in acquiring such to show that this is in fact helping towards
> that, then we should consider whether the current strategy is the right
> thing to focu
On 12/05/2016 01:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> On 03.12.16 23:16, Rich Bowen wrote:
>> So, this question was asked several weeks ago, and, so far, we have no
>> statistics. I wonder if, now that there appears to be some interest
>> around GSoC 2017 starting up, someone could look back at their notes
On 03.12.16 23:16, Rich Bowen wrote:
> So, this question was asked several weeks ago, and, so far, we have no
> statistics. I wonder if, now that there appears to be some interest
> around GSoC 2017 starting up, someone could look back at their notes and
> answer some of these questions.
>
> While
What money are we putting into this?
Cheers,
Uli
On 03.12.16 23:16, Rich Bowen wrote:
> So, this question was asked several weeks ago, and, so far, we have no
> statistics. I wonder if, now that there appears to be some interest
> around GSoC 2017 starting up, someone could look back at their no
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote:
> ...I would be happy
> to post it there, if somebody could grant the rights...
What's your username for https://blogs.apache.org ?
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I would like to help out with the task listed at
https://helpwanted.apache.org/task.html?3c264f0f
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
36 matches
Mail list logo
