Speaker notifications haven't gone out yet - so I was just informed from
Angela. Supposedly, they're going out tomorrow.
From: William A Rowe Jr
To: ComDev
Cc: hadr...@apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: Apachecon reviewers
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Karanjeet Singh wrote:
> Hi Hadrian,
>
> Just a corner case - did you check your spam folder?
>
Thank you for pointing out the obvious, I haven't been there in months,
but it seems that gmail is especially aggressive about treating our
speaker notifications as s
On 09/27/2016 10:13 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> I've made a first pass of improving the various event pages, with what I
> think each URL is/should be used for.
>
> https://www.apache.org/events/
> Permanent landing URL for jumping off to any event related content.
>
> https://www.apache.org/eve
On 09/28/2016 03:57 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> Hi there,
> How is one supposed to confirm the acceptance? the CFP page still lists it
> as "New" and the reply address is a "no-reply"
You email the address mentioned in the acceptance/rejection email itself.
Please don't expect the CFP page to
I think you can reply to the email that is at the message bottom
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> Hi there,
> How is one supposed to confirm the acceptance? the CFP page still lists it
> as "New" and the reply address is a "no-reply"
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:53 PM,
Hi there,
How is one supposed to confirm the acceptance? the CFP page still lists it
as "New" and the reply address is a "no-reply"
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> I did get the notification, thank you very much. Unfortunately it looks
> like I've been wai
Big +1 here. Projects that can't be repeatably built risk decay
faster than those that can.
Given the needs of some build chains (especially Windows, in my
experience) I also endorse the fact that this does not specifically
call out /automated/ builds, though projects should be striving to
achieve
Hi Rich,
I did get the notification, thank you very much. Unfortunately it looks
like I've been waitlisted which means that very likely I won't see you
guys in Spain.
And yes, I actually consider this quite an achievement myself, kudos to
you all. It was not a complaint from me, I had to mak
On 09/28/2016 08:44 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Hi Karan, Humbedooh,
>
> I didn't find anything in the spam folder. It would be good if the
> status would be adjusted from 'new' to the appropriate one in the CFP
> dashboard. If one knows the status and could inform me privately that'd
> be appr
Hi Karan, Humbedooh,
I didn't find anything in the spam folder. It would be good if the
status would be adjusted from 'new' to the appropriate one in the CFP
dashboard. If one knows the status and could inform me privately that'd
be appreciated too.
Daniel, it says 09/30 for publishing the s
That is an interesting one. And funny enough, there are two parts of that
IMHO.
1. Check out from source control repository, and re-produce a source
release build, resulting in a releasable artifact.
2. That the built artifact can be downloaded, and built for a given
platform/deployment.
In my p
All,
After a discussion on the general@incubator.a.o mailing list [1], I'd
like to propose the following addition to the project maturity model.
RE50
The release process is documented and repeatable to the extent that
someone new to the project is able to independently generate a release
build.
Welp, it says September 30th on the main page (which AIUI is what we're
going for) - there seems to be some mixup here.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 09/28/2016 06:03 AM, Karanjeet Singh wrote:
> Hi Hadrian,
>
> Just a corner case - did you check your spam folder?
>
> Sincerely,
> Karan
>
> On Sep
13 matches
Mail list logo
