Re: Thanks for AOO

unsubscribe On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Yay. Thanks for sharing. > > Sent from my Windows Phone > > From: Dennis E. Hamilton > Sent: ‎12/‎4/‎2015 7:29 AM > To: dev@community.apache.org

Re: Thanks for AOO

Now I finally understand what people are talking about. Awesome! Jim, is this something we could publish? I assume it's easy to ask for permission, and maybe send Brenda a T-shirt (I am in a T-shirt phase today :) ). Hadrian On 12/04/2015 10:29 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: The PDF is filed

RE: Thanks for AOO

Yay. Thanks for sharing. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Dennis E. Hamilton Sent: ‎12/‎4/‎2015 7:29 AM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: RE: Thanks for AOO The PDF is filed at

RE: Thanks for AOO

The PDF is filed at . > -Original Message- > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 04:45 > To: dev@community.apache.org > Subject: Re: Thanks for AOO > > Attachment must have gotten stripped off > > > On Dec 4, 2015, at 7:

Re: Thanks for AOO

Attachment must have gotten stripped off > On Dec 4, 2015, at 7:34 AM, sebb wrote: > > Original mail was sent to Comdev; no attachment. > > Followup with attachment was sent to private@openoffice.a.o > > On 4 December 2015 at 12:21, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Hmmm... not sure. It shows up in my

Re: Thanks for AOO

Original mail was sent to Comdev; no attachment. Followup with attachment was sent to private@openoffice.a.o On 4 December 2015 at 12:21, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Hmmm... not sure. It shows up in my copy. > >> On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:42 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >> >> Did an attachment get stripped? >

Re: Thanks for AOO

Hmmm... not sure. It shows up in my copy. > On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:42 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > > Did an attachment get stripped? > > -Original Message- > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:56 AM > To: ComDev > Subject: Thanks for AOO > >