On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Andy Flosdorf
wrote:
> In the past 18 months, our organization has undertaken a project utilizing
> Apache Storm. However, we’ve recently learned that Twitter has replaced
> Storm with Heron.
>
>
>
> Are there any resources that discuss this transition by Twitter
[Failing at dealing with this cross-posted and variously-branched discussion on
two lists, so I am doing it too. Also OT with respect to Ross's declaration,
but it has to do with the fact that "release" is not so well distinguished as
one might hope.]
Minor nit? #1:
Generally, because of wha
Hello Andy,
Recommend reaching out to the Apache Storm community directly [1]. Most
like to the user list [2].
Thanks
Joe
[1] https://storm.apache.org/community.html
[2] u...@storm.apache.org
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Andy Flosdorf
wrote:
> Hello –
>
>
>
> In the past 18 months, our
Hello -
In the past 18 months, our organization has undertaken a project utilizing
Apache Storm. However, we've recently learned that Twitter has replaced Storm
with Heron.
Are there any resources that discuss this transition by Twitter in the context
of Apache's plans to continue to develop
>
> They do? This is the statement of the VP Legal, so whether it is right or
> wrong, here at the ASF we attempt to honor the 'spirit' of the policy of
> other licensors when we use their code, and we would hope others would
> honor the 'spirit' of our policies here. It that is the underlying
>
Jim already addressed this in an overlapping email. I tried to address it but
it seems quibbling over individual words describing process was more important
than understanding the intended message. So let me try again, this time using
the corrected words in my email and adding Jim's further clar
> On Aug 20, 2015, at 11:19 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>>
>> A snapshot is not a release. Licenses "kick in" at distribution/
>> release.
>>
>
> Lets just imagine if Jim, VP Legal is actually correct in his
> interpretation, and
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > On Aug 20, 2015, at 8:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
> >
> > On Aug 20, 2015 08:52, "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
> >>
> >> Coming in late.
> >>
> >> A snapshot is not a release. Licenses "kick in" at distribution/
> >> release.
> >
> > I
> On Aug 20, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Coming in late.
>>
>> A snapshot is not a release. Licenses "kick in" at distribution/
>> release.
>
> Are you sure? When you have a public source control repo, with a
> LICENS
> On Aug 20, 2015, at 8:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2015 08:52, "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
>>
>> Coming in late.
>>
>> A snapshot is not a release. Licenses "kick in" at distribution/
>> release.
>
> I want to fix FUD before it infests the rafters and subfloor. I really
> hav
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>> ...Their changes do mean that when people come to the solr-user mailing
>> list looking for help, we sometimes have to refer them to the downstream
>> maintainers, because we can'
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 8/20/2015 8:03 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > If a distro takes a release of Apache X, and make significant changes to
> > it, and then distributes it, I believe that it's not OK with us for them
> to
> > simply call it Apache X. I've see
a
در تاریخ ۲۱ اوت ۲۰۱۵ ۱۸:۲۴، "Shawn Heisey" نوشت:
> On 8/20/2015 8:03 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > If a distro takes a release of Apache X, and make significant changes to
> > it, and then distributes it, I believe that it's not OK with us for them
> to
> > simply call it Apache X. I've seen
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> ...Their changes do mean that when people come to the solr-user mailing
> list looking for help, we sometimes have to refer them to the downstream
> maintainers, because we can't make any sense of where things are
To me this is clearly a
On 8/20/2015 8:03 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> If a distro takes a release of Apache X, and make significant changes to
> it, and then distributes it, I believe that it's not OK with us for them to
> simply call it Apache X. I've seen some evidence that Gentoo Linux makes a
> regular habit of this
15 matches
Mail list logo
