GTK is enabled by default for our builds.
I don't see this listed as a build requirement for either Windows or
Mac, however. So, should this build flag be changed to non-enabled
generally and only enabled for Linux?
--
-
MzK
Thanks Nick, those are great!
I consider the problem solved.
In anticipation of the next AC-anywhere, I want to help turn this (and the
previous two under Linux Foundation) into a form that can be
repurposed/reused/customized along with information on how to do it and the
resources/skills that
Thanks Nick,
I received the files from you.
I don't know about backgrounds. It may end up being plain, or extra credit
once I have anything workable with the essential parts.
I notice that the ACNA14 slides have a Linux Foundation credit on them. I
would think this is appropriate for ACNA15
> On Mar 22, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
>
> I've had a go at updating my Budapest template for Austin, draft so far
> available at:
> http://people.apache.org/~nick/Draft_ACNA15_Template_Nick.odp
>
> I know there was a bit of feedback on the Budapest ones about visability /
> contra
Hi All
I've had a go at updating my Budapest template for Austin, draft so far
available at:
http://people.apache.org/~nick/Draft_ACNA15_Template_Nick.odp
I know there was a bit of feedback on the Budapest ones about visability /
contrast, so advice on if these need changes before offering th
Le 22/03/2015 14:42, jan i a écrit :
On 22 March 2015 at 14:35, Pierre Smits wrote:
HI Bertrand,
Thanks for the clarification regarding
http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html
Shouldn't http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html then also
explicitly
reflect that vetoes aren't allowed
On 22 March 2015 at 14:35, Pierre Smits wrote:
> HI Bertrand,
>
> Thanks for the clarification regarding
> http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html
>
> Shouldn't http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html then also
> explicitly
> reflect that vetoes aren't allowed when it comes to on- and
HI Bertrand,
Thanks for the clarification regarding
http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html
Shouldn't http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html then also explicitly
reflect that vetoes aren't allowed when it comes to on- and ofboarding
contributors as committer and PMC member? That would
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> ...Thanks for the clarification Bertrand, this was also unclear to me. Should
> we not amend the newcommitter page?..
That would be great, I don't have time right now myself.
-Bertrand
Le 22/03/2015 13:56, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
...The following document https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html
states:
A positive result is achieved by Consensus Approval i.e. at least 3 +1
votes and no vetoes
There a
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I have extracted the three background images from the ACEU14
presentation. They are not possible to morph. They are JPEGs and there
is no reasonable way to extract pieces and morph the logo and conference
name.
I'll send you the images I used o
On 03/21/2015 01:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
Twitter just posted the following blog post:
https://blog.twitter.com/2015/introducing-tweetdeck-teams
Interesting! On a related subject: should we promote the usage of this
for managing all o
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> ...The following document https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html
> states:
>
> A positive result is achieved by Consensus Approval i.e. at least 3 +1
> votes and no vetoes
There are no vetoes when electing committers, that do
On 20/03/15 19:46, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
ApacheCon EU 2014
http://people.apache.org/~nick/NickTemplateACEU14.odp
(this ought to have been uploaded to the Templates site too, but
apparently Linux Foundation never clarified the terms of usage for some
images that Nick included into it)
We do hav
14 matches
Mail list logo
