Re: more prominence for ASF activities?

On 07/25/2014 03:36 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Pierre Smits > wrote: > > I agree. The only link on the front page (homepage) of apache.org > that > comes in the neighbourhood of events is the confere

Re: Non-released Dependencies

On 28 July 2014 10:20, Greg Stein wrote: > Agreed that #2 is best. > > (and I'll also note I was a bit slack with some commentary; releases need > to be signed, Also source releases must be published via the ASF mirror system. > so a path/revision or git-tag is not necessarily a true s/necessar

Re: Non-released Dependencies

Agreed that #2 is best. (and I'll also note I was a bit slack with some commentary; releases need to be signed, so a path/revision or git-tag is not necessarily a true release; just trying to get across that you need a *specific* set of source for a dependency) Seems that Andreas is going to expl