On 2/12/14, 7:23 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> I know this looks old-fashioned, even downright anachronistic to
>> "push-hourly-from-CI" people; but deciding *what* to release *as a
>> community* is an important responsibility of ASF PMCs.
I'd like to throw out some thoughts in support of this thinking and help
explore how we can support faster releases at Apache.
Cordova has bias to shipping. We started shipping on a schedule mid 2011
and this was a very deliberate choice, after two years of scattered, and
frankly reactionary, rele
Should projects wishing to circumvent Apache policy avoid Apache? See two
people can play that rhetorical game Marvin.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 12, 2014, at 10:23 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>> I know this looks old-fashioned,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I know this looks old-fashioned, even downright anachronistic to
> "push-hourly-from-CI" people; but deciding *what* to release *as a
> community* is an important responsibility of ASF PMCs. Putting
> things on a rigid schedule basically ski
I've done the first pass through the CFP ratings, and made the
appropriate Yes/No designations on http://tm3.org/cfpreview
There's still quite a bit of work to do, since there's still a LOT of
talks that are marked "Maybe".
Here's a few things I can use help with:
1) Identify tracks that are
On 02/12/2014 11:57 AM, Jan Willem Janssen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm a bit confused as to what the current status is on the track
selection for ApacheCon NA. I've seen the proposed track list, but
what do we do with the content of those tracks? And what about
On 02/12/2014 08:08 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'm going through the reviewed talks and marking things as "yes" and "no"
in http://tm3.org/cfpreview/ based on their average score. I would
appreciate if someone would go through the CFP site and mar
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'm going through the reviewed talks and marking things as "yes" and "no"
> in http://tm3.org/cfpreview/ based on their average score. I would
> appreciate if someone would go through the CFP site and mark a line in some
> way if that speaker i
I'm going through the reviewed talks and marking things as "yes" and
"no" in http://tm3.org/cfpreview/ based on their average score. I would
appreciate if someone would go through the CFP site and mark a line in
some way if that speaker indicated that they need funding.
I'm sure I'll need more
On 2/11/14, 11:04 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Joseph Schaefer
> wrote:
>> The core question for me is do we want to continue
>> down this path of attempting to be all things to
>> all people with no common culture or values or processes,
>> or is there a floor so
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> If we view Apache as a certification of a certain style of quality, then
> that fits nicely with my suggestion that anyone wanting a faster cadence
> should go do such under their own name/brand
>
+1
> and roll the changes up to the mainl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm a bit confused as to what the current status is on the track
selection for ApacheCon NA. I've seen the proposed track list, but
what do we do with the content of those tracks? And what about the
proposals that still are not categorized, is tha
12 matches
Mail list logo
