On 7 May 2013 20:44, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> Join infra. You will get to know all the dark corners of the ASF ;).
>
you might have heard of the bad, the good the ugly on the infra list called
janIV.
at least we have said "hi" on different ocasions.
And about the dark corners, I think I got my sh
Join infra. You will get to know all the dark corners of the ASF ;).
No really. You will hear about lists, projects, web pages, etc. you would never
have heard of
otherwise or only if you spent a lot of time looking.
Uli
On 07.05.2013 20:39, Noah Slater wrote:
> Sure, but it's not very prominen
On 7 May 2013 20:03, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> We already have a listing at [1]. It's hidden behind 2 clicks from the
> main site. We could use that
> as a starting point.
>
> Uli
>
> [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/
>
> On 07.05.2013 18:22, Noah Slater wrote:
> > A note to committers@ m
Sure, but it's not very prominent, and things get lost in the noise. I was
thinking something more like a page for foundation-wide lists that people
might want to subscribe to. I really had to go hunting around for things
when I decided to up my involvement and a lot of it was a surprise for me.
We already have a listing at [1]. It's hidden behind 2 clicks from the main
site. We could use that
as a starting point.
Uli
[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/
On 07.05.2013 18:22, Noah Slater wrote:
> A note to committers@ might be a good first start. But, in general, I
> really thi
+0
I'm not against it but I don't actively support it either. Do you know
release-discuss@? That was
meant as a cross-project list for discussing release issues and has seen seven
threads within the
last three years with the last one from march last year (excluding cross-list
announcements). I
It would be a shame to scrap the idea because we are presuming the worst in
everyone. That seems very anti-ASF to me. A better approach might be to
appoint "social" moderators (i.e. gate keepers of the civility) that reign
the conversation back in if and when things go off-track.
Also, we do have
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> WDYT?
I'm skeptical that it will work out well. I'd expect the list to descend into
shouting matches between warring tribes and to end up as an echo chamber
dominated by the faction which can generate the greatest volume of email.
On
A note to committers@ might be a good first start. But, in general, I
really think we need to do a better job of communicating the existing
mailing lists we have. Perhaps a page on the main site, or on the community
site, would be a good start.
On 7 May 2013 16:58, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> ...the problem with Yet Another Mailing List, which is that we don't know
> about the ones that we
> already have, and so how will people know about this one. Hmm. Dunno
We'll tweet about it! Tell the world! Write fantastic things on it so
On May 7, 2013, at 11:36 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Well, release-discuss[1] was one place suggested for things like "how do we
> version releases?" (The only correct answer being semver! *wink*) But
> unfortunately, discussion sort of dried up there.
>
> [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mb
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Well, release-discuss[1] was one place suggested for things like "how do we
> version releases?" (The only correct answer being semver! *wink*) But
> unfortunately, discussion sort of dried up there
I wasn't aware of that one - yes that's t
Well, release-discuss[1] was one place suggested for things like "how do we
version releases?" (The only correct answer being semver! *wink*) But
unfortunately, discussion sort of dried up there.
[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-release-discuss/
[2] http://semver.org/
On 7 May 20
On May 7, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Hi Bertrand,
>
> This is a great idea + 1.
>
> Infact a useful exchange of ideas of will be on release versioning and audit
> of stability. To be precise, when should we call a software 1.0, the PMC can
> decide itself, but can it solicit fee
Thank you Luciano, Piergiorgio, Chris and Bertrand for the warm welcome.
Glad to hang out here, looking forward to provide some concrete contributions,
Suresh
On May 6, 2013, at 2:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> Please join me in w
Hi Bertrand,
This is a great idea + 1.
Infact a useful exchange of ideas of will be on release versioning and audit of
stability. To be precise, when should we call a software 1.0, the PMC can
decide itself, but can it solicit feedback from other projects which went this
route and have them sp
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Why not use dev@community (with subject tags?)...
IMO community is about community building, tech@ would be for the
hardcore tech stuff.
It's a different audience IMO (with overlap of course), which warrants
a different list.
-Bertrand
Why not use dev@community (with subject tags?)
I don't object to a new list, just adding another option.
Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
On 7 May 2013 06:20, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We don't seem to have a place for cross-cutting technical discussion
Indeed a great idea, +1.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Charith Madusanka wrote:
> +1, nice idea.
>
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> >
> > On May 7, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We don't seem to have a place for cross-cutting t
+1, nice idea.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On May 7, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We don't seem to have a place for cross-cutting technical discussions
> > at the ASF - language and system issues, standards implementations,
> > etc.
>
On May 7, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We don't seem to have a place for cross-cutting technical discussions
> at the ASF - language and system issues, standards implementations,
> etc.
>
> To fix this, I suggest creating a public t...@apache.org list, owned
> by comde
Appears to be a great idea.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We don't seem to have a place for cross-cutting technical discussions
> at the ASF - language and system issues, standards implementations,
> etc.
>
> To fix this, I suggest creating a public t...@ap
Hi,
We don't seem to have a place for cross-cutting technical discussions
at the ASF - language and system issues, standards implementations,
etc.
To fix this, I suggest creating a public t...@apache.org list, owned
by comdev, with the following rules:
-Technical discussions on cross-cutting top
23 matches
Mail list logo
