That policy applies to the private lists of PMCs, such as
libcloud-private. I do not believe in spirit that policy should apply
to committers@ -- and, it most likely doesn't. While committers@ is
indeed "private", it is not a PMC private list which I believe that
policy is discussing.
Infra is not
2012/8/13 Daniel Shahaf :
> I think there are two separate problems here,
>
> 1) Given that an update was sent to committers@, is it ok to quote it or
> summarise it or mention its existence or non of the above
>
> 2) Where should updates be sent to
>
>
> The latter is being debated on infra-dev@.
I think there are two separate problems here,
1) Given that an update was sent to committers@, is it ok to quote it or
summarise it or mention its existence or non of the above
2) Where should updates be sent to
The latter is being debated on infra-dev@. The former I'm unhappy with
quoting a
On 8/11/2012 11:07 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Konstantin Kolinko wrote on Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 20:43:56 +0400:
2
The below is a quote from the e-mail that was sent to the committers@
mailing list yesterday by Tony Stevenson of the Apache Infrastructure
Team. I see that you are not an ASF committer