Re: Capturing mail (was Re: Stackoverflow)

2011-05-14 Thread David Blevins
On May 14, 2011, at 3:20 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos) > > On 13 May 2011, at 02:31, David Blevins wrote: > >> For me tagging and voting and (i forgot) the marking the question answered >> (thanks, Benson) are the parts I would love. >> >> I wr

Re: Capturing mail (was Re: Stackoverflow)

2011-05-14 Thread David Blevins
On May 14, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > A student popped up a while ago on the Mahout mailing with a very nice > little magic program that would sift through email archives to find good > question/answer pairs in email threads. > > The results were quite impressively good. The progra

Re: Capturing mail (was Re: Stackoverflow)

2011-05-14 Thread Grant Ingersoll
We've also done some clustering of ASF Archives (See MAHOUT-588) that could show similar items, potentially. I've often thought it would be cool to automatically classify email as to the expertise level required (which could also be done w/ Mahout) and I've always wanted our Mailing List manage

Re: Capturing mail (was Re: Stackoverflow)

2011-05-14 Thread Ted Dunning
A student popped up a while ago on the Mahout mailing with a very nice little magic program that would sift through email archives to find good question/answer pairs in email threads. The results were quite impressively good. The program didn't find a lot of pairs, but the pairs it did find were

Capturing mail (was Re: Stackoverflow)

2011-05-14 Thread Ross Gardler
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos) On 13 May 2011, at 02:31, David Blevins wrote: > For me tagging and voting and (i forgot) the marking the question answered > (thanks, Benson) are the parts I would love. > > I write some really good responses sometimes and even *I* have a ha