Re: Pointers

2011-01-03 Thread Rafał Krupiński
W dniu 03.01.2011 18:45, Michael Giannakopoulos pisze: Hello to all Apache Commons Developers! I wish a happy new year and i hope that all your expectations will come true! I would like to propose a new feature in apache commons... Wouldn't it be great if commons api provided a pointer operator (

Re: Pointers

2011-01-03 Thread Rafał Krupiński
W dniu 03.01.2011 20:15, Stephen J. Butler pisze: 2011/1/3 Rafał Krupiński: W dniu 03.01.2011 18:45, Michael Giannakopoulos pisze: Hello to all Apache Commons Developers! I wish a happy new year and i hope that all your expectations will come true! I would like to propose a new feature in

Re: Future of Transaction subproject

2010-03-28 Thread Rafał Krupiński
On 28.03.2010 20:13, Henri Yandell wrote: Unless anyone speaks up for it, I'm all for our making a Retired section and moving Transaction to it. Possibly we could relabel 'Dormant' then to be more Sandbox focused and consider some others for Retired (Attributes, Discovery, Modeler jump to mind).

Re: [IO] Progress Monitor

2010-04-06 Thread Rafał Krupiński
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > We use [io] for our server, which is great, but when looked at using it from > our Eclipse based tools, I found the lack of support for monitoring a blocker. > > What about providing and support and pluggable progress monitor, pre

Re: [IO] Progress Monitor

2010-04-06 Thread Rafał Krupiński
On 06.04.2010 19:03, Gary Gregory wrote: -Original Message- From: Rafał Krupiński [mailto:r.krupin...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 03:59 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [IO] Progress Monitor [...] interface ProgressMonitor{ void begin(int whole); void progress

Re: [IO] Progress Monitor

2010-04-08 Thread Rafał Krupiński
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: [..] > When I am copying a directory containing possibly hundreds of files, I do > want to know how far along I am. Recall that File >objects describe both files and directories. Good point. > The progress monitor itself can decide if the ope

Re: [NET] Move to o.a.c Maven groupId

2010-08-16 Thread Rafał Krupiński
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > The idea is vice versa: Do not change the groupId, unless you are > considering changes as serious as changing the package name. I don't see why. Domain based groupIds are standard now, they are easier to find in IDE tools and I hear maven