Hi,
The current ant build file for this relies on having previously used
mvn to build the project
Index: build.xml
===
--- build.xml (revision 727000)
+++ build.xml (working copy)
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@
-
Hi,
> +) I assume that this implies that you have junit on your path already?
> +) please not that I have to get a hold on the junit.jar in
> "test-distribution-prepare"
> +) maybe we need a variable to pick the junit library from?
I think the main point of the patch is that just because you don'
Hi,
> While you can make that argument for the Interface, the 'm_' prefix is
> necessary in order to write .NET code that is portable between C# and
> languages that do not support a "_" prefix for class level fields. Hence,
> the "m_" (a hold over from when the 'm' denoted 'module')
or don't tr
Hi,
> Well, I started devving for MS before migrating to Linux and OS X, so I do
> retain some of those practices.
Fair enough, and it wasn't a veiled insult or anything :) I just
truly want to know why people would still use that particular
convention with modern OO languages and IDEs. Visual