Hi All,
There is a JIRA feature request (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CSV-293) for supporting multiple null
strings, not just one.
To be honest, I did not really know much about the mentioned CSVW
definitions, but based on the comment in the ticket "Feel free to provide a
PR on GitHub"
Hi,
While I'm still getting familiar with things here, I'd like to share my
thoughts on this issue. In my view, version 2.0 typically signifies a break
in backward compatibility, which makes the second solution—changing the
supertype's behavior—acceptable. Given the existence of BeanUtilsBean2 and
Hi,
It is true, that static methods can't be overridden in a subclass, however
they can be hidden. So final keyword prevents method hiding.
It also helps make the code explicit.
Finally, the final keyword can slightly improve performance because the JVM
should not check if the method is hidden or
+1
I have tested this (on my laptop) with 'mvn' using:
openjdk version "1.8.0_382"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (Temurin)(build 1.8.0_382-b05)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Temurin)(build 25.382-b05, mixed mode)
Apache Maven 3.9.6 (bc0240f3c744dd6b6ec2920b3cd08dcc295161ae)
Maven home: C:\Program File
Hi,
In my opinion it would be nice if all the methods do the same for the same
null or empty string input and would be consistent, but...
I won't change the existing API in the current 3.x version.
So I think we should fix them only in 4.0.
However, we should fix it in the Strings class, before it
I added my thoughts to the test refactoring in
https://github.com/apache/commons-validator/pull/301 pull request.
Regards,
David
Gary Gregory ezt írta (időpont: 2024. dec. 26.,
Cs, 16:36):
> Thanks for the tip Sam!
>
> In git master, I just pushed using JUnit Pioneer instead of direct global
>
+1
I have tested this (on my laptop) with 'mvn' using:
Apache Maven 3.8.1 (05c21c65bdfed0f71a2f2ada8b84da59348c4c5d)
Maven home: C:\Program Files\JetBrains\IntelliJ IDEA
2023.1\plugins\maven\lib\maven3
Java version: 1.8.0_322, vendor: Amazon.com Inc., runtime:
C:\Users\sigee\.jdks\corretto-1.8.0_
Hi,
If the LF is forced by anything (git config, gitattribute, checkstyle,
etc), what will happen to the file based tests where there is a
purposefully CRLF line ending, because the test covers a fixed issue that
was specifically related to windows files. E.g. in CSV.
I mean files here for example
ce I
> can't build or consider creating a release candidate until this is
> addressed.
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2024, 4:31 PM Dávid Szigecsán wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I checked it on Java 23 and seemed fine.
> >
> > [INFO] Running
> org.a
Hi,
I checked it on Java 23 and seemed fine.
[INFO] Running org.apache.commons.validator.routines.CalendarValidatorTest
[INFO] Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
0.104 s -- in org.apache.commons.validator.routines.CalendarValidatorTest
Apache Maven 3.9.9 (8e8579a9e7
10 matches
Mail list logo