[beanutils] BeanUtilsBean2 vs BeanUtilsBean, ConvertUtilsBean2 vs ConvertUtilsBean

Hi All, I want us to decide what we want for 2.0 with the classes BeanUtilsBean2 vs BeanUtilsBean, and ConvertUtilsBean2 vs ConvertUtilsBean. For your convenience: - https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils2/BeanUtilsBean2.java - https:/

Re: [beanutils] Thoughts on PR https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/276

I feel like this PR is a good idea. Just from a safety perspective and not accidentally logging a password. On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 5:41 PM Gary D. Gregory wrote: > Hi All, > > Does anyone have thoughts on PR > https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/276 ? > > TY, > Gary > > --

Re: [beanutils] BeanUtilsBean2 vs BeanUtilsBean, ConvertUtilsBean2 vs ConvertUtilsBean

Hi, While I'm still getting familiar with things here, I'd like to share my thoughts on this issue. In my view, version 2.0 typically signifies a break in backward compatibility, which makes the second solution—changing the supertype's behavior—acceptable. Given the existence of BeanUtilsBean2 and