Hello,
I would like to clarify the reason why there were no releases for so long
time period? There have been solved some critical bugs, and it would be
nice to get them live. But instead, while waiting for a release, we need to
fork the lib and release it internally ourselves.
Could you please c
Hi,
The reason is probably the lack of volunteer time by one of the committers.
I am planning a release soon as I am leaving my current $work and must have
1 month in-between jobs to release components. I can try dbutils, but no
promises since I never released it (not sure if I ever worked on it)
Hi Alexey,
We are volunteers here, there is no traditional schedule or management.
Your message now puts dbutils on our collective todo list for a release.
Personally, I plan on releasing "soon" lang, io, pool, dbcp, cvs, text,
configuration, but likely not in that order.
Gary
On Mon, May 2, 2
Hi Gary,
I'm not sure what to add frankly. If anything, a full-fledged generic type
signature generator would be cool, but that's beyond my reach... :)
And my simple case (think List) works perfectly fine right now.
Many greetings,
Stefan
On Sun, 1 May 2022 at 13:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
I am currently preparing a feature for Lang, that makes use of
MethodHandle.invoke(Object...)
According to the Javadocs [1], this should be fine, but I am getting
this from the animal-sniffer-maven-plugin:
[INFO] --- animal-sniffer-maven-plugin:1.21:check
(checkAPIcompatibility) @ commons-la
Followup question: Should the following reveal a property definition?
Because, I only see uses of ${javaTarget.majorVersion}, and no
definition.
$ mvn help:effective-pom | grep -i majorVersion
java${javaTarget.majorVersion}${javaTarget.minorVersion}
java${javaTarget.majorVersion}${javaTarget
BTW Interesting that those signatures are 6 years old, but the coordinates
seems to be correct (don’t know if the content is correct)
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/mojo/signature/
Older major versions have vendor specific suffixes, none of them use minor
version numbers.
Gruss
Be
Thanks for the reply, Bernd. Any suggestions on how I could proceed?
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 8:17 PM Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> BTW Interesting that those signatures are 6 years old, but the coordinates
> seems to be correct (don’t know if the content is correct)
>
> https://repo1.maven.org/maven
