Re: svn commit: r1859859 [1/5] - in /commons/proper/jcs/trunk/commons-jcs-core/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/access/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/admin/ m

On 24.05.19 12:33, Gary Gregory wrote: > -1 > > We are now on gitbox https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-jcs.git > When did that happen? I don't remember an announcement or a vote. Bye, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: Changes to SVN proper that have occurred since move to Git

Forgot to say that I have yet to check the commons-* trees (commons-build etc) On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 13:13, sebb wrote: > > I've done a comparison of the latest SVN revision with the most recent > trunk(master) Git entry that includes a line of the following form: > git-svn-id: > https://svn-us

Changes to SVN proper that have occurred since move to Git

I've done a comparison of the latest SVN revision with the most recent trunk(master) Git entry that includes a line of the following form: git-svn-id: https://svn-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/trunk@1821853 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 AFAICT any discrepancies mean that the

Re: svn commit: r1859859 [1/5] - in /commons/proper/jcs/trunk/commons-jcs-core/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/access/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/admin/ m

On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 12:27, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > > On 24.05.19 12:33, Gary Gregory wrote: > > -1 > > > > We are now on gitbox https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-jcs.git > > > > When did that happen? I don't remember an announcement or a vote. Jan 2019 https://lists.apache.org/threa

Re: svn commit: r1860080 - /commons/proper/jexl/trunk/README.md

On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 15:22, wrote: > > Author: sebb > Date: Sun May 26 14:22:37 2019 > New Revision: 1860080 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1860080&view=rev > Log: > Revert r1831656: should not have been applied to SVN copy > > Modified: > commons/proper/jexl/trunk/README.md > > M

Re: Changes to SVN proper that have occurred since move to Git

I think all but jcs have now been dealt with. On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 13:28, sebb wrote: > > Forgot to say that I have yet to check the commons-* trees (commons-build etc) > > On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 13:13, sebb wrote: > > > > I've done a comparison of the latest SVN revision with the most recent

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.5 based on RC1

Hi all, are any of you available to review this RC? Gary On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:39 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > To: dev@commons.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.5 based on RC1 > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Ap

Re: svn commit: r1859859 [1/5] - in /commons/proper/jcs/trunk/commons-jcs-core/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/access/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/admin/ m

On 26.05.19 15:54, sebb wrote: > Jan 2019 > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053bb8f18e90800d918956f69364167b23c0cdca175568300b1108f6@%3Cdev.commons.apache.org%3E Ok, I missed that one completely. What do I have to do? Bye, Thomas -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.5 based on RC1

> On May 26, 2019, at 10:47 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi all, are any of you available to review this RC? I’ll try to get to it before the end of the day. -Rob > > Gary > >> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:39 PM Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> To: dev@commons.apache.org >> Subject: [VOTE] Release A

[rng] Upgrade examples to Java 8

Currently the examples projects use: Examples-jmh: JDK 1.6 Examples-quadrature: JDK 1.7 Examples-stress: JDK 1.8 Examples-sampling: JDK 1.8 Examples-jpms: JDK 1.9 Having JMH at level 1.6 prevents testing against algorithms in SecureRandom (newer algorithms in 1.8), ThreadLocalRandom (1.7) and Sp

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.5 based on RC1

Hi Gary, +0.5 I get build failures to do with environment properties look-up because one of my environment properties is resolved with current known variables. It can be reproduced using this (on a linux-type build with a bash shell): export BAD_VAR='${USER}@${HOSTNAME}’ mvn -V clean package

Re: [rng] Upgrade examples to Java 8

Le dim. 26 mai 2019 à 19:28, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > Currently the examples projects use: > > Examples-jmh: JDK 1.6 > Examples-quadrature: JDK 1.7 > Examples-stress: JDK 1.8 > Examples-sampling: JDK 1.8 > Examples-jpms: JDK 1.9 > > Having JMH at level 1.6 prevents testing against algorithms in

Re: Proposal to introduce JUnit 5 in commons-numbers

Hello, and excuse me for the late reply, I didn't realize until now that the online archive of the mailing list can have more than one page per month, and since my original email didn't show up on the first page, I was wondering whether it ever went through (I didn't subscribe to the list, which I

Re: Proposal to introduce JUnit 5 in commons-numbers

(please make sure to CC me directly on replies) On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 17:17, Heinrich Bohne wrote: > ... (I didn't subscribe to the list, which I now regret as I am editing > the header fields of this email manually, hoping that I do it correctly and > that the message will be attributed to the

Aw: Re: Proposal to introduce JUnit 5 in commons-numbers

+1 We did the migration 4 -> 5 for various products at work. It was straightforward. I vote for a clean cut, as well. s/Before/BeforeEach/ s/After/AfterEach and you are halfway through. Sven Gesendet: Montag, 27. Mai 2019 um 07:28 Uhr Von: "Eitan Adler" An: "Heinrich Bohne" Cc: "C