Hi.
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 21:44:05 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:25 PM, Gilles
wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:48:40 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All,
Let me rephrase the question: Is the change part of what RNG
considers its
public API?
The first Clirr error was settled, a
I am cancelling this vote because I personally would vote -1 on this RC. Many
thanks to those that looked at RC6.
Cheers,
-Rob
> On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:42 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> We have added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons RNG 1.0 was
> released, so I would like to rele
Thank you Rob! If there are any BC breakage at all left, please note why
they are there and why they are ok in the release notes.
Gary
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018, 07:48 Rob Tompkins wrote:
> I am cancelling this vote because I personally would vote -1 on this RC.
> Many thanks to those that looked at
Oh and you should consider marking the API we are adding back as
@deprecated.
Gary
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018, 07:48 Rob Tompkins wrote:
> I am cancelling this vote because I personally would vote -1 on this RC.
> Many thanks to those that looked at RC6.
>
> Cheers,
> -Rob
>
> > On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:4
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 08:00:11 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
Oh and you should consider marking the API we are adding back as
@deprecated.
?
There is no replacement.
[I've tried to explain the issue in a previous message.]
Gilles
Gary
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018, 07:48 Rob Tompkins wrote:
I am cancelli
> On Aug 8, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Thank you Rob! If there are any BC breakage at all left, please note why
> they are there and why they are ok in the release notes.
Yes. that makes sense to me.
-Rob
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018, 07:48 Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>> I
> On Aug 8, 2018, at 10:26 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 08:00:11 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Oh and you should consider marking the API we are adding back as
>> @deprecated.
>
> ?
> There is no replacement.
> [I've tried to explain the issue in a previous message.]
We can state
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/85
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Hi,
I'm trying to contribute for VFS-360. What a nice ticket number!
After a brief look, I'm considering to add a new provider in a
separate package, 'http4' (based on HttpComponents HttpClient),
keeping the old one, 'http' (based on the old Commons HttpClient),
as-is. The reason is that I don't w
@Gilles - thoughts here?? Just kinda what I was thinking, but I’m only a +0 on
this change. So, if you want to revert it before going up with 1.1, that’s fine.
-Rob
> On Aug 8, 2018, at 12:42 PM, chtom...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Repository: commons-rng
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/1.1 50b984
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/87
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Hello Rob.
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 12:44:16 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
@Gilles - thoughts here?? Just kinda what I was thinking, but I’m
only a +0 on this change. So, if you want to revert it before going
up
with 1.1, that’s fine.
I don't understand this change after what I answered to Gary's str
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 12:04:58 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Aug 8, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
Thank you Rob! If there are any BC breakage at all left, please note
why
they are there and why they are ok in the release notes.
Yes. that makes sense to me.
It's already there!
Gille
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 12:06:18 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Aug 8, 2018, at 10:26 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 08:00:11 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
Oh and you should consider marking the API we are adding back as
@deprecated.
?
There is no replacement.
[I've tried to explain the issue
Hello,
I am for http4. In the begining it wont be maped in the StandardManager but can
be changed later on.
I do wonder if we can get rid of a Special https Provider and have only one
(http4) which can handle both Kinds of URLs… not quite sure, what do you think?
Besides that, I wonder if we a
Hi Bernd,
Thanks for your remarks. Please see my comments inline below.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am for http4. In the begining it wont be maped in the StandardManager but
> can be changed later on.
Sounds good to me.
>
> I do wonder if we can get ri
Hello!
I would be very interested in an updated release of Commons Imaging to the
Maven central repo.
I've begun using Commons Imaging in the OpenPDF library, however I need
features which
are only available in recent builds of Commons Imaging.
The "0.97-incubator" version is too old and doesn't
17 matches
Mail list logo
