[VOTE][RESULT] Create new component commons-signing

The following votes were cast: Binding: +1: markt, bodewig, sebb, ebourg, ggregory, oheger, chtompki, ecki Non-binding: +1: rmannibucau Two of the +1 binding votes indicating a preference for Jira rather than GitHub issues. The vote therefore passes. I'll start setting this up soon. Mark

Re: [CSV][POLL] How to provide mutable records

On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:10:56 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes > I've not had time to review this yet but I hope to get to it sometimes this > week. Thanks. I'll wait for that before prepping a 1.6 RC so we get time to decide if this is in or not.

Re: commons-csv git commit: CSV-216: Avoid Arrays.copyOf()

On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:16:13 + (UTC), st...@apache.org wrote: Repository: commons-csv Updated Branches: refs/heads/CSV-216 637ad2d7a -> f66a83901 CSV-216: Avoid Arrays.copyOf() Why? as .clone() will do We should rather avoid using "clone()". Gilles -- at least until someone tries

Discussion: New commons module/project

Disclaimer: I am not certain of the proper nomenclature to use here so when I say module consider that it may be a sub-project or project under commons. The term should be taken to mean a collection of the things under discussion. I would like to propose a commons module for the development and

Re: Discussion: New commons module/project

Hello, I am not sure how this might turn out, is it only discussion or do you also want to develop a specification language/toolset? In either case it does not sound like the typical commons sub-project. What infrastructure would you require? Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net _

JDK 10: First Release Candidate - JDK 10 b43

   Hi Benedikt, *JDK 10 build 43 is our first JDK 10 Release Candidate [1]* * JDK 10 Early Access  build 43 is available at : - jdk.java.net/10/ Notable changes since previous email.** *build 43 * * JDK-8194764 - javac incorrectly flags

Re: Discussion: New commons module/project

The goal is arrive at a common understanding of the specific algorithm and potentially one or more code examples for implementation which may be pseudo code. I think all this requires is: 1. jira (or similar) to track the discussions and mark them when they are closed 2. A mechanism to

Re: Discussion: New commons module/project

Hi Claude, Quite sure there was similar discussion some time ago. But I can't recall if it was here in commons, somewhere in the incubator, or labs? But regarding commons, before the component/jira/mailing list are created, I think it would have to go either via sandbox or incubator first? Pe

Re: [text] Adapt the Log4j 2 Interpolator to [text]

Am 12.02.2018 um 21:53 schrieb Gary Gregory: On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Pascal Schumacher < pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote: please revert "Update actual Checkstyle from 6.19 to 8.8.", as Checkstyle 7+ requries Java 8+. Done. T

Re: commons-csv git commit: CSV-216: Avoid Arrays.copyOf()

On 13 February 2018 at 09:31, Gilles wrote: > On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:16:13 + (UTC), st...@apache.org wrote: >> >> Repository: commons-csv >> Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/CSV-216 637ad2d7a -> f66a83901 >> >> >> CSV-216: Avoid Arrays.copyOf() > > > Why? Agreed >> as .clone() will do > > >

Re: commons-csv git commit: CSV-216: Avoid Arrays.copyOf()

On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:40:13 +, sebb wrote: On 13 February 2018 at 09:31, Gilles wrote: On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:16:13 + (UTC), st...@apache.org wrote: Repository: commons-csv Updated Branches: refs/heads/CSV-216 637ad2d7a -> f66a83901 CSV-216: Avoid Arrays.copyOf() Why? Agreed

Re: Discussion: New commons module/project

A sort of commons-algorithms type library? That kind of strikes me as what Commons is in the first place. I could see it being broken down into components, though. For example, commons-graph < https://commons.apache.org/sandbox/commons-graph/> (seems inactive) for graph algorithms, commons-tree for

Re: [text] Adapt the Log4j 2 Interpolator to [text]

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Pascal Schumacher < pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote: > Am 12.02.2018 um 21:53 schrieb Gary Gregory: > >> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Gary Gregory >> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Pascal Schumacher < >>> pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote: >>>

Re: [text] Update from Java 7 to Java 8?

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > What about now? :-) > Fine with me. Let's see if anyone objects... Gary > > Am 12.02.2018 um 20:53 schrieb Gary Gregory: > >> When? >> >> Gary >> >> > > - > To unsub

Re: [text] Update from Java 7 to Java 8?

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Pascal Schumacher < > pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote: > >> What about now? :-) >> > > Fine with me. Let's see if anyone objects... > What about: - Release 1.3 as is WRT Java, which is Java 7 - Switch to Jav

Re: [text] Update from Java 7 to Java 8?

Am 13.02.2018 um 23:14 schrieb Gary Gregory: What about: - Release 1.3 as is WRT Java, which is Java 7 - Switch to Java 8 for 1.4. Fine with me. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional comm

[All][RNG] Java 9 ready?

Hi. Some enhancements are needed to the build "infrastructure" (CP, maven plugins, multi-module layout) in order for the "Commons" artefacts to be used fully as "modules" under Java 9 and beyond. See my last comment in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-40 Regards, Gilles --

Re: Discussion: New commons module/project

If this was a project to create specs AND provide reference implementations I think it would make sense. I don’t see how a project that just creates specs fits with Commons personally. Ralph > On Feb 13, 2018, at 1:46 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > A sort of commons-algorithms type library? That

Re: Discussion: New commons module/project

What can / does commons provide that cannot be done with GitHub? chas > On Feb 13, 2018, at 5:58 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > If this was a project to create specs AND provide reference implementations I > think it would make sense. I don’t see how a project that just creates specs > fits with