> On Sep 20, 2017, at 1:10 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Yep, that does it! Bug in the BUILDING.md then. Not a blocker but should be
> fixed in the repo ASAP.
>
> Gary
>
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>
>> I think the "x" on the volume mount with /root/commons-jelly
GitHub user cccCody opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/17
Tweak Javadoc spelling
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/cccCody/commons-cli master
Alternatively you can review and apply th
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/17
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/13376128)
Coverage remained the same at 96.287% when pulling
**19849509da2a483ba0a8543
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/17
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/13376128)
Coverage remained the same at 96.287% when pulling
**19849509da2a483ba0a8543
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 07:47:07 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-09-20, Gilles wrote:
[...]
Unfortunately I cannot answer the question about signatures for
modular
builds, I'm not really a maven person. What I can say is that I
never
invoke any "assembly" goal when I create a release, the
GitHub user PascalSchumacher opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/18
.travis.yml: install open-jdk6, as it was removed from the default image
(see https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/8199)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository b
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/18
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/13377297)
Coverage remained the same at 96.287% when pulling
**9bdb3dbe184a8a481bf6e8b
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/18
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/13377297)
Coverage remained the same at 96.287% when pulling
**9bdb3dbe184a8a481bf6e8b
On 20.09.17 22:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> back on the release topic (sorry for the delay, have been very busy
> lately): does it sound ok for everyone if I backport the jcache changes in
> 2.2 and release it from here (Some pointer on which branch I can reuse or
> if I should create one from
Hi Benedikt,
Three items to share with you today
* *JDK 9 General Availability
*
o GPL'd binaries from Oracle are available here:
+ http://jdk.java.net/9
o See Mark Reinhold's email for more details on the Release [1]
+ delivery of Project Jigsaw [2]
* Are you J
Github user kinow commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/63#discussion_r140401739
--- Diff: src/main/java/org/apache/commons/text/WordUtils.java ---
@@ -614,13 +615,11 @@ public static String swapCase(final String str) {
for
Github user kinow commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/63#discussion_r140401636
--- Diff: src/main/java/org/apache/commons/text/WordUtils.java ---
@@ -614,13 +615,11 @@ public static String swapCase(final String str) {
for
Github user kinow commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/63#discussion_r140401548
--- Diff: src/main/java/org/apache/commons/text/FormattableUtils.java ---
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
* This constructor is public to permit tools that req
13 matches
Mail list logo
