> On Jan 11, 2017, at 2:23 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:
>
> On the main page [1] the link to the javadoc is wrong. It is [2] instead of
> [3]:
>
> "The package descriptions in the JavaDoc give an overview ..."
>
> So you'll get a 404.
>
>
Thanks for that catch. I thought I had caught all o
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/28
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user stain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/28
Thanks! Merged. I also added you as a `` to be shown on
https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-rdf/team-list.html - hope that's OK.
Any other OSGi issues? How do you do the equivalent of
+1
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Brent Worden
wrote:
> Are the originally mentioned transforms in or out of scope of
> commons-numbers?
>
> Brent
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Gilles
> wrote:
>
> > See discussion thread, copied below.
> >
> > [ ] Yes
> > [ ] Yes but I prefer this nam
+1
> On Jan 11, 2017, at 8:39 AM, Eric Barnhill wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Brent Worden
> wrote:
>
>> Are the originally mentioned transforms in or out of scope of
>> commons-numbers?
>>
>> Brent
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Gilles
>> wrote:
>>
>>> See
Github user acoburn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/28
@stain for a `ServiceLoader` equivalent in OSGi, it would make sense to add
a `Require-Capability` and `Provide-Capability` to each implementation's
`MANIFEST.MF` -- it will simply be some minor
GitHub user acoburn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/29
[COMMONSRDF-53] Add ServiceLoader support in OSGi
Resolves: COMMONSRDF-53
This adds bundle metadata for the commons-rdf modules to make it easier to
work with the Java `ServiceLoader` i
+1
Gilles wrote:
> See discussion thread, copied below.
>
> [ ] Yes
> [ ] Yes but I prefer this name: ...
> [ ] No, because ...
>
> I'll assume that this is a lazy consensus vote, to be closed in 72
> hours
> from now (i.e. on January 12, at 18:00:00 UTC).
>
> Thanks,
> Gilles
-
+1, but without the transforms.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 9/01/2017 à 19:02, Gilles a écrit :
> See discussion thread, copied below.
>
> [ ] Yes
> [ ] Yes but I prefer this name: ...
> [ ] No, because ...
>
> I'll assume that this is a lazy consensus vote, to be closed in 72 hours
> from now (i.e. on
> On Jan 11, 2017, at 7:23 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> +1, but without the transforms.
>
Yes. The transforms do seem a tad out of place.
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
>> Le 9/01/2017 à 19:02, Gilles a écrit :
>> See discussion thread, copied below.
>>
>> [ ] Yes
>> [ ] Yes but I prefer this nam
Looks like it is fixed now with build #275 [1].
- Bindul
[1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Commons-Compress-Windows/275/
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:15 AM, sebb wrote:
> And I've switched off the build emails
>
> On 5 January 2017 at 11:40, sebb wrote:
>> I've moved it back to "Waiting for Infra"
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/29
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
12 matches
Mail list logo
