[VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

Hi all, after long discussions I think we have gathered enough information to decide whether we want to accept the Chimera project as a new Apache Commons component. Proposed name: Apache Commons Crypto Proposal text: https://github.com/intel-hadoop/chimera/blob/master/PROPOSAL.html Initial Code

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component Gruss Bernd Von: Benedikt Ritter Gesendet: Montag, 21. März 2016 09:45 An: Commons Developers List Cc: Hadoop Common Betreff: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component Hi all, after long discussions I think we have gathered enough i

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

Hello Oliver, very nice artifacts, good work. - builds with java 6, 7 and 8 - site looks good - reports look good Only thing I found is: - build.xml and build.properties.sample are in the tag but not in the src archive. The ant build can probably be dropped (does it work anyway?). No blocker for

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 for new component. Luc Le 21/03/2016 09:57, Bernd Eckenfels a écrit : > +1 Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component > > > Gruss > Bernd > > Von: Benedikt Ritter > Gesendet: Montag, 21. März 2016 09:45 > An: Commons Developers List > Cc: Hadoop Common > Betreff: [VOTE] Accept Chimera a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > +1 for new component. > > Luc > > Le 21/03/2016 09:57, Bernd Eckenfels a écrit : > > +1 Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component > > > > > > Gruss > > Bernd > > > > Von: Benedikt Ritter > > Gesendet: Montag, 21. März

Re: [math] questions on GA

Hi. On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:12:11 +0300, Семенов Кирилл wrote: In effect, some time ago we evoked the possibility to drop GA support altogether since the code seemed little used and a lot of work was anticipated for making it useful beyond demo applications. It is rather surprising, that AS

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) -- bart...@x-reizend.de > On 21 Mar 2016, at 11:05, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > >> +1 for new component. >> >> Luc >> >> Le 21/03/2016 09:57, Bernd Eckenfels a écrit : >>> +1 Accept Chimera as

Re: [math] A Java implementation of STL: A Seasonal-Trend Decomposition Procedure Based on Loess

Hello. On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:31:14 -0700, Greg Brandt wrote: Hey Commons Math, As part of some work on anomaly detection in time series data, a couple colleagues and I have put together a Java implementation of STL , which we think might be generally

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 for the new component However the name may be misleading since the scope is limited. Emmanuel Bourg Le 21/03/2016 09:45, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > Hi all, > > after long discussions I think we have gathered enough information to > decide whether we want to accept the Chimera project as a n

[VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

The vote passes with three votes in favor and none against. Thanks for taking time to review. Best Regards, Evan On 03/19/2016 11:06 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > If you add the -Xdoclint:none command line argument, that will ignore the > javadoc errors. I love how the JDK itself doesn't compile with

[math] Fwd: Please add your release data for 'commons'

Hi, Can a Math PMC member add our release data to the database? I don't have the necessary permissions. Thanks, Evan Forwarded Message Subject:Please add your release data for 'commons' Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:48:51 + From: Apache Reporter Service Reply-To:

Re: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

Le 21/03/2016 13:44, Evan Ward a écrit : > The vote passes with three votes in favor and none against. Well, in fact I am not sure it passes yet ... As far as I know, there are only 2 PMC members who voted: Oliver and myself. Could a third PMC member look at it? best regards, Luc > > Thanks f

Re: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

On 03/21/2016 09:18 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 21/03/2016 13:44, Evan Ward a écrit : >> The vote passes with three votes in favor and none against. > Well, in fact I am not sure it passes yet ... > > As far as I know, there are only 2 PMC members who voted: Oliver and myself. Oh, I didn't real

Re: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:29:48 -0400, Evan Ward wrote: On 03/21/2016 09:18 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 21/03/2016 13:44, Evan Ward a écrit : The vote passes with three votes in favor and none against. Well, in fact I am not sure it passes yet ... As far as I know, there are only 2 PMC members w

Re: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

Le 21/03/2016 16:42, Gilles a écrit : > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:29:48 -0400, Evan Ward wrote: >> On 03/21/2016 09:18 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Le 21/03/2016 13:44, Evan Ward a écrit : The vote passes with three votes in favor and none against. >>> Well, in fact I am not sure it passes yet ..

Re: [math] Fwd: Please add your release data for 'commons'

Le 21/03/2016 13:54, Evan Ward a écrit : > Hi, > > Can a Math PMC member add our release data to the database? I don't have > the necessary permissions. Now that we have 3 PMC, I have updated the database. You can continue with the process. best regards, Luc > > Thanks, > Evan > > >

Re: [math] Fwd: Please add your release data for 'commons'

Thanks Luc! On 03/21/2016 11:48 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 21/03/2016 13:54, Evan Ward a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> Can a Math PMC member add our release data to the database? I don't have >> the necessary permissions. > Now that we have 3 PMC, I have updated the database. > You can continue with the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

-0, I don't like the idea of a JNI library. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:45 AM Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi all, > > after long discussions I think we have gathered enough information to > decide whether we want to accept the Chimera project as a new Apache > Commons component. > > Proposed name: Ap

[math] Staging site

Hi, I'm on step 19 in Release.howto.txt, I've committed the updated site using svn, but I get a 404 when I try to view it at http://commons.staging.apache.org/proper/commons-math Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? I've noticed that the staging URL for other components such as [lang] or [io] also res

Re: [math] Staging site

On 03/21/2016 07:32 PM, Evan Ward wrote: > Hi, > > I'm on step 19 in Release.howto.txt, I've committed the updated site > using svn, but I get a 404 when I try to view it at > http://commons.staging.apache.org/proper/commons-math > > Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? I've noticed that the staging U

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

-0.9 ditto I trust all the people voting +1 are prepared to help maintain the code, including the JNI bits? On 21 March 2016 at 18:13, James Carman wrote: > -0, I don't like the idea of a JNI library. > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:45 AM Benedikt Ritter wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> after long disc

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

Hi Benedikt, Am 21.03.2016 um 09:58 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hello Oliver, > > very nice artifacts, good work. > > - builds with java 6, 7 and 8 > - site looks good > - reports look good > > Only thing I found is: > - build.xml and build.properties.sample are in the tag but not in the src > a

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

Le 21/03/2016 22:06, Oliver Heger a écrit : > maintaining two different build files is a pain and error-prone. The > trend seems to be dropping the ant build. I would be in favor of this. +1 for dropping the Ant build. Emmanuel Bourg

commons-vfs: org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.http.test.HttpProviderTestCase fails

I’ve forked and cloned the repo from GitHub and the build fails with: Tests run: 90, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5.223 sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.http.test.HttpProviderTestCase testHttp405(org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.http.test.HttpProviderT

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

+1 to drop ant. Gary On Mar 21, 2016 2:24 PM, "Emmanuel Bourg" wrote: > Le 21/03/2016 22:06, Oliver Heger a écrit : > > > maintaining two different build files is a pain and error-prone. The > > trend seems to be dropping the ant build. I would be in favor of this. > > +1 for dropping the Ant bu

Re: commons-vfs: org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.http.test.HttpProviderTestCase fails

Hello, I think it is a new problem. It is a bit unfortunate that those tests rely on external web sites (and those seeem to no longer exist). If you want, you can file the report directly in the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS/ It seems to be safe to ignore that failure. Gruss

Re: commons-vfs: org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.http.test.HttpProviderTestCase fails

Fixed. Root cause: defunct URL. Resolution: changed core/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/vfs2/provider/http/test/HttpProviderT estCase.java -final FileObject f = VFS.getManager().resolveFile("http://www.w3schools.com/webservices/tempconv ert.asmx?action=WSDL"); +final FileObject

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

+1 drop ant On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:06 PM Oliver Heger wrote: > Hi Benedikt, > > Am 21.03.2016 um 09:58 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > Hello Oliver, > > > > very nice artifacts, good work. > > > > - builds with java 6, 7 and 8 > > - site looks good > > - reports look good > > > > Only thing I fo

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Uma On 3/21/16, 1:45 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: >Hi all, > >after long discussions I think we have gathered enough information to >decide whether we want to accept the Chimera project as a new Apache >Commons component. > >Proposed name: Apache Commons Crypto >Propo

RE: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) -Original Message- From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 4:46 PM To: Commons Developers List Cc: Hadoop Common Subject: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component Hi all, after long discussions I think we have gathe

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

Any reason JNI cannot be replaced by JNA? (sorry for the hijack!) Gary On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:21 PM, sebb wrote: > -0.9 ditto > > I trust all the people voting +1 are prepared to help maintain the > code, including the JNI bits? > > > On 21 March 2016 at 18:13, James Carman > wrote: > > -

RE: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

Hi Sebb, Thank you for raising the question. The expertise point of view, the folks in the initial committer list is committed to maintain the code, including Java and JNI code. From the community point of view, it is open and it welcomes other committers and developers in the community to suppo

RE: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) -Original Message- From: Chen, Haifeng [mailto:haifeng.c...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 10:06 AM To: Commons Developers List Cc: Hadoop Common Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component +1 (non-binding) -Original Message-

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component 2016-03-22 10:05 GMT+08:00 Chen, Haifeng : > +1 (non-binding) > > -Original Message- > From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 4:46 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Cc: Hadoop Common

RE: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

>> Any reason JNI cannot be replaced by JNA? (sorry for the hijack!) We didn't try JNA. Technically, JNA should be working here. JNI is used considering a few factors: 1. Keep the library dependency as light as we can, considering the JNI is a relative thin layer and simple here. 2. Performance

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Dapeng Sun wrote: > +1 (non-binding) Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component > > 2016-03-22 10:05 GMT+08:00 Chen, Haifeng : > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] > >

Re: [math] A Java implementation of STL: A Seasonal-Trend Decomposition Procedure Based on Loess

Hey Gilles, Thanks for the comments. >> Would you be around to to keep maintaining to code? Yes. >> Out of curiousity, can it detect any kind of periodicity? The goal of the algorithm is to decompose a time series with known seasonality / periodicity into trend, seasonal, and remainder compone