On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:06:35 -0600, Ole Ersoy wrote:
If math is broken up into smaller artifacts it will make it easier
for users to upgrade, even if it it breaks compatibility, as well as
speed up the release frequency. So for example:
commons-math-optimization (Or even more granular
commons-mat
On 11/07/2015 04:25 AM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to raise that concern in the message already, but it is probably
> worth repeating it explicitly: this is not a real bug
> in the Commons-Collection class, and it might not be worse fixing it, as
> there are possibly tons of other
On 07/11/2015 10:13, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/07/2015 04:25 AM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I tried to raise that concern in the message already, but it is probably
>> worth repeating it explicitly: this is not a real bug
>> in the Commons-Collection class, and it might not be wors
A roughly equivalent alternative would be to release beta artifacts
until the API stabilizes and use a different base package and different
Maven coordinates for each iteration.
For example, commons-math 4.0-beta1 is released with the
org.apache.commons:commons-math4-beta1 coordinates and the clas
Le 07/11/2015 11:00, Gilles a écrit :
> [At some point, releasing separate JARs could also provide us with
> indirect feedback on which parts of CM are actually used.]
You might find this interesting:
https://codesearch.debian.net/perpackage-results/import
org.apache.commons.math
Emmanuel
---
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:17 AM Phil Steitz wrote:
> Here is an idea that might break our deadlock re backward
> compatibility, versioning and RERO:
>
> Agree that odd numbered versions have stable APIs - basically adhere
> to Commons rules - no breaks within 3.0, 3.1, ..., 3.x... or 5.0,
> 5.1..
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 16:52:21 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
A roughly equivalent alternative would be to release beta artifacts
until the API stabilizes and use a different base package and
different
Maven coordinates for each iteration.
For example, commons-math 4.0-beta1 is released with the
or
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 16:56:45 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 07/11/2015 11:00, Gilles a écrit :
[At some point, releasing separate JARs could also provide us with
indirect feedback on which parts of CM are actually used.]
You might find this interesting:
Thanks for the link. Interesting ind
I guess searching github is more representative:
https://github.com/search?q=org.apache.commons.math3&type=Code&utf8=%E2%9C%93
Am 07.11.2015 um 18:43 schrieb Gilles:
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 16:56:45 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 07/11/2015 11:00, Gilles a écrit :
[At some point, releasing separ
On 11/7/15 10:29 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 16:52:21 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> A roughly equivalent alternative would be to release beta artifacts
>> until the API stabilizes and use a different base package and
>> different
>> Maven coordinates for each iteration.
>>
>> For examp
As long as the maven coordinates follow suit, go for it. The community will
let us know if it is a pain in the ass. Also, no need to worry about
even/odd with this approach
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:29 PM Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 16:52:21 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > A roughly equi
On 11/7/15 12:58 PM, James Carman wrote:
> As long as the maven coordinates follow suit, go for it. The community will
> let us know if it is a pain in the ass. Also, no need to worry about
> even/odd with this approach
I think its better to use the even/odd approach with this package
naming trick
On 11/7/15 2:15 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/7/15 12:58 PM, James Carman wrote:
>> As long as the maven coordinates follow suit, go for it. The community will
>> let us know if it is a pain in the ass. Also, no need to worry about
>> even/odd with this approach
> I think its better to use the eve
So is the idea to change both the Maven artifact ID and package name
for the beta releases?
i.e. the stable releases would use
Maven AID: commons-math4
package: org.apache.commons.math4
and beta releases:
Maven AID: commons-math4-beta{n}
package: org.apache.commons.math4.beta{n}
Have I got thi
Howdy,
Thought I'd dive in here. Sorry that things got pointed in your direction
on this. That was out of our control. Chris and I had a bunch of
conversations about if we thought this was worth reporting to you when we
discovered it. Perhaps we made the wrong decision, hard to say. We don't
think
Thanks. :)
Am 06.11.2015 um 11:46 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hello Pascal,
2015-11-05 20:25 GMT+01:00 Pascal Schumacher :
Hello everybody,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:summary-panel
shows:
RELEASE PLAN
Lang 2.x - There are no
16 matches
Mail list logo
