[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons Math 3.5 released

2015-04-18 Thread Luc Maisonobe
The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the availability of Apache Commons Math 3.5. Apache Commons Math is a library of lightweight, self-contained mathematics and statistics components addressing the most common problems not available in the Java programming language or Commons Lang. Ver

Re: [math] threading redux

2015-04-18 Thread Phil Steitz
On 4/17/15 5:20 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > I thought I'd share this read with you guys: > http://coopsoft.com/ar/CalamityArticle.html > > I'm not sure how closely these problems relate with what [math] is trying > to do, but it's a interesting read. Thanks! Kind of supports the idea that somehow a

Re: svn commit: r1673285 - in /commons/proper/dbutils/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/dbutils/ main/java/org/apache/commons/dbutils/handlers/ test/java/org/apache/commons/dbutils/handlers/

2015-04-18 Thread Carl Hall
Thanks for the reminder! I updated changes.xml in a later commit. I will try to make the update when the relevant work is committed. On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello Carl, > > please remember to add fixes to changes.xml so it is easier for RMs to > generate relea

[GitHub] commons-lang pull request: #LANG-1114 TypeUtils.equals is broken f...

2015-04-18 Thread datalorax
GitHub user datalorax opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/65 #LANG-1114 TypeUtils.equals is broken for WildcardType TypeUtils.equals is broken for WildcardType, when compared with non-wildcard type. It was broken because it was returning true!

Re: [math] threading redux

2015-04-18 Thread Gilles
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:53:56 -0500, James Carman wrote: Do you have any pointers to code for this ForkJoin mechanism? I'm curious to see it. The key thing you will need in order to support parallelization in a generic way What do you mean by "generic way"? I'm afraid that we may be trying to

Re: [math] threading redux

2015-04-18 Thread James Carman
I think I got sidetracked when typing that email. I was trying to say that we need an abstraction layer above raw threads in order to allow for different types of parallelism. The Future abstraction is there in order to support remote execution where side effects aren't good enough. As for a co