I have to admit that I am not very familiar with [exec] ...
Let me have a look at [exec] (in about 9 hours) and I'll let you know what
I think about it.
Ricardo Espírito Santo
On 4 June 2013 23:09, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Ricardo Espírito Santo <
> ricardoespsa..
Hi Benedikt,
thanks for your reply and for pointing me out to these threads.
I will have a look at them in about 9 hours and hopefully I can then
contribute something to them.
Regarding becoming a developer I have read the general information plus the
FAQs and similar pages but I would love some
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:29 AM, sebb wrote:
> DBCP is complicated to release, because the source has to be
> pre-processed in order to build additional versions of the code.
> (unlike the rest of Java, JDBC is not generally upwards compatible).
>
Alternative proposal (worked for me in the past
Hi Jochen,
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:29 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> DBCP is complicated to release, because the source has to be
>> pre-processed in order to build additional versions of the code.
>> (unlike the rest of Java, JDBC is not generally upwards compatible).
>>
>
>
Hi, Jörg,
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
>
> This is here not possible, since we provide *implementations* that
> implement
> the affected interfaces. E.g. Statement interface has more methods which
> have arguments of types that are not even present in the older JDBC versi
2013/5/23 Gary Gregory
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > 2013/5/21 Gary Gregory
> >
> > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2013/5/21 Emmanuel Bourg
> > > >
> > > > > Le 21/05/2013 17:47, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> > >
Ok a bit more educated about the [exec] project now and yes I do believe
[exec] is sort of too small to be left on its own.
I liked the idea of merging it into [launcher] or the other way around but
then I liked your next idea even better merging them both into [lang] ...
However, on a second tho
On 5 June 2013 22:53, Ricardo Espírito Santo wrote:
> Ok a bit more educated about the [exec] project now and yes I do believe
> [exec] is sort of too small to be left on its own.
>
> I liked the idea of merging it into [launcher] or the other way around but
> then I liked your next idea even bett
OK a bit of a lame question but how do I reply to that [2] topic?
Ricardo Espírito Santo
On 5 June 2013 09:42, Ricardo Espírito Santo wrote:
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> thanks for your reply and for pointing me out to these threads.
>
> I will have a look at them in about 9 hours and hopefully I can t
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:11 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 June 2013 22:53, Ricardo Espírito Santo
> wrote:
> > Ok a bit more educated about the [exec] project now and yes I do believe
> > [exec] is sort of too small to be left on its own.
> >
> > I liked the idea of merging it into [launcher] or the ot
10 matches
Mail list logo
