Re: [ALL] release instructions warning

2013-04-23 Thread sebb
On 23 April 2013 02:19, Gary Gregory wrote: > To release Codec 1.8, I just tried following > https://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html > > In particular: > > "Before you close< > http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#close-stage>the > staging repository you must remove

Re: [ALL] release instructions warning

2013-04-23 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:39 AM, sebb wrote: > On 23 April 2013 02:19, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > To release Codec 1.8, I just tried following > > https://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html > > > > In particular: > > > > "Before you close< > > http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-arti

Re: [ALL] release instructions warning

2013-04-23 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:39 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 23 April 2013 02:19, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> > To release Codec 1.8, I just tried following >> > https://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html >> > >> > In particular: >> > >> > "Befo

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4

2013-04-23 Thread Gary Gregory
For record, I deleted the wrong checksum files, so I had to redo the staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-129/ Gary On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > My +1. > > Gary > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4

2013-04-23 Thread sebb
On 23 April 2013 14:04, Gary Gregory wrote: > For record, I deleted the wrong checksum files, so I had to redo the > staging repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-129/ > > In that case, I think you need to restart the VOTE. > Gary > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 20

[VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 [Take 2]

2013-04-23 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello All: This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, /again/) Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6 Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 1 are: NOTHING. I deleted too many checksum files in Nexus before trying to release the repo, so I created a new staging repo: https://reposi

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 [Take 2]

2013-04-23 Thread Gary Gregory
My +1. Gary On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hello All: > > This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, /again/) > > Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6 > > Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 1 are: > > NOTHING. I deleted too many checksum files in Nexu

Re: [ALL] release instructions warning

2013-04-23 Thread sebb
Some follow-up: the .ASC hashes can (should) be deleted before the vote starts. As to the (non-Maven) tarballs: another approach would be to create them in Nexus as per usual, but move them (copy/delete) to the svnpubsub staging area [1] before the vote starts. It would make the reviewers job sli

Re: [ALL] release instructions warning

2013-04-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-04-23, sebb wrote: > As to the (non-Maven) tarballs: another approach would be to create them in > Nexus as per usual, but move them (copy/delete) to the svnpubsub staging > area [1] before the vote starts. > It would make the reviewers job slighly harder - one extra URL to download > and

Re: [ALL] release instructions warning

2013-04-23 Thread sebb
On 23 April 2013 15:39, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2013-04-23, sebb wrote: > > > As to the (non-Maven) tarballs: another approach would be to create them > in > > Nexus as per usual, but move them (copy/delete) to the svnpubsub staging > > area [1] before the vote starts. > > > It would make the

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 [Take 2]

2013-04-23 Thread Gary Gregory
This VOTE is open for at least 72 hours until April 26 2013 at 1:00 PM EST. Gary On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hello All: > > This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, /again/) > > Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6 > > Changes from 1.8-RC4 VO

Staging site?

2013-04-23 Thread Henri Yandell
Looking at the site building docs, I could see how to modify the site (install a CMS plugin or just modify SVN and test locally, I went with the latter). My commit was then built by the buildbot. Where is the staging site to look at the buildbot output so I can then be happy pressing Publish? I co

Re: Staging site?

2013-04-23 Thread sebb
On 23 April 2013 19:25, Henri Yandell wrote: > Looking at the site building docs, I could see how to modify the site > (install a CMS plugin or just modify SVN and test locally, I went with the > latter). My commit was then built by the buildbot. > > Where is the staging site to look at the build

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 [Take 2]

2013-04-23 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi Gary, I am very sorry that this happened to you. When I did my last release, I was pretty nervous when doing this manual deletion step. It would really be cool if this somehow could be automated. Regarding the vote: I am not sure what exactly I have to check. This time the staging reposit

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 [Take 2]

2013-04-23 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Hi Gary, > > I am very sorry that this happened to you. When I did my last release, I > was pretty nervous when doing this manual deletion step. It would really be > cool if this somehow could be automated. > > Regarding the vote: I am not sur

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 [Take 2]

2013-04-23 Thread Gary Gregory
Canceled as the Nexus staging repo is missing -bin and -src files. Gary On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hello All: > > This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, /again/) > > Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6 > > Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 1

[VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 [Take 3]

2013-04-23 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello All: This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, sigh, /again/) Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6 Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 2 are: NOTHING. In Nexus, I deleted the bin and src archive by mistake. Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 1 are: NOTHING. In Nexus, I de

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 [Take 2]

2013-04-23 Thread sebb
On 23 April 2013 21:02, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Oliver Heger > wrote: > > > Hi Gary, > > > > I am very sorry that this happened to you. When I did my last release, I > > was pretty nervous when doing this manual deletion step. It would really > be > > cool if this s

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 [Take 3]

2013-04-23 Thread sebb
On 23 April 2013 21:52, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hello All: > > This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, sigh, /again/) > > Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6 > > Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 2 are: > > NOTHING. In Nexus, I deleted the bin and src archive by mistake. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 [Take 3]

2013-04-23 Thread Gary Gregory
On Apr 23, 2013, at 16:54, sebb wrote: > On 23 April 2013 21:52, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Hello All: >> >> This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, sigh, /again/) >> >> Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6 >> >> Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 2 are: >> >> NOTHING. In Nex

[beans] Documentation unavailable

2013-04-23 Thread Paul Benedict
FYI, the website no longer hosts the API and user guide. The links are broken. Paul

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 [Take 2]

2013-04-23 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:52 PM, sebb wrote: > On 23 April 2013 21:02, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Oliver Heger > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Gary, > > > > > > I am very sorry that this happened to you. When I did my last release, > I > > > was pretty nervous when doing

[beans] Documentation links are broken

2013-04-23 Thread Paul Benedict
FYI, the site points to non-existent API and user guide. The links are broken on both the LHS navigation and the main content. Paul

Re: [beans] Documentation links are broken

2013-04-23 Thread sebb
On 23 April 2013 22:53, Paul Benedict wrote: > FYI, the site points to non-existent API and user guide. The links are > broken on both the LHS navigation and the main content. > > Beans does not exist. I assume you meant Beanutils? > Paul >

Re: [beansutils] Documentation links are broken

2013-04-23 Thread Paul Benedict
yes :-) On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:58 PM, sebb wrote: > On 23 April 2013 22:53, Paul Benedict wrote: > > > FYI, the site points to non-existent API and user guide. The links are > > broken on both the LHS navigation and the main content. > > > > > Beans does not exist. I assume you meant Beanut

Re: [IO] CharSequenceInputStream - strange code

2013-04-23 Thread sebb
On 22 April 2013 18:10, Gary Gregory wrote: > I looked at this a couple of month ago and found it equally confusing. > > I think I've finally sorted out the issues... skip() now skips the byte buffer (i.e. the same buffer as read) and AFAICT mark/reset is working OK. Also available() does now in

Re: Staging site?

2013-04-23 Thread Henri Yandell
So if you're using the SVN approach, you check locally, then commit and go hit publish on the CMS? Hen On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:50 AM, sebb wrote: > On 23 April 2013 19:25, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > Looking at the site building docs, I could see how to modify the site > > (install a CMS plu