On 02/23/2013 12:21 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2013-02-22 21:38, t...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: tn
>> Date: Fri Feb 22 20:38:59 2013
>> New Revision: 1449206
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1449206
>> Log:
>> Fix jar deploy, add osgi bundle metadata.
>>
>> Modified:
>> commons/proper/
On 2013-02-23 09:01, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 02/23/2013 12:21 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2013-02-22 21:38, t...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: tn
>>> Date: Fri Feb 22 20:38:59 2013
>>> New Revision: 1449206
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1449206
>>> Log:
>>> Fix jar deploy, add osgi b
Hi,
I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix
release or start to work on new features right away and release a 1.9
(including bug fixes of course ;-)
Benedikt
--
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
h
On 02/22/2013 01:11 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC1.
>
> This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.3:
>
> == Fixed Bugs ==
>
> * DataSourceClassPathResolver will now correctly set the DataSource
>
Hallo Thomas,
o.a.c.email.util.MimeMessageUtils has very low test coverage. This may not
be a blocker, but we should provide some more coverage for that class.
Regards,
Benedikt
2013/2/23 Thomas Neidhart
> On 02/22/2013 01:11 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to call a vote
Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hallo Thomas,
>
> o.a.c.email.util.MimeMessageUtils has very low test coverage. This may not
> be a blocker, but we should provide some more coverage for that class.
In general, yes, but this is a bug fix release.
Cheers,
Jörg
-
On 02/21/2013 09:29 PM, Julius Davies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to go ahead with my original patch, or at least
> understand better how I can improve it, or why it's not acceptable.
>
> Thomas did manage to improve our numbers with a very nice & small
> patch (here's a benchmark comparison):
congrats for your Chinese skills! :)
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:28 PM, wrote:
> Author: britter
> Date: Sat Feb 23 14:28:36 2013
> New Revision: 1449325
Hi,
I have worked through a few issues. I'm concentrating on bugs right now and
try to sort them into 1.8.4 and later than 1.8.4. I've asked reporters to
create patches against trunk, although I don't now how much feedback we
will get with this, as some of the issues date back several years.
Bene
Christian Schneider from the felix project has posted some useful
information to the felix dev ML [1].
Maybe we should just add document for using JCL in OSGi (via pax logging
for example) to the website?
Benedikt
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40felix.apache.org/msg28887.html
2013/2/22 Be
On 02/23/2013 05:53 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Christian Schneider from the felix project has posted some useful
> information to the felix dev ML [1].
> Maybe we should just add document for using JCL in OSGi (via pax logging
> for example) to the website?
Thanks, sounds like a good plan.
I ha
why? where did you read email address shall be not in explicit form?
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 4:38 PM, wrote:
> Author: britter
> Date: Sat Feb 23 15:38:17 2013
12 matches
Mail list logo
