Re: svn commit: r1442739 - /commons/sandbox/beanutils2/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils2/ClassLoaderBuilder.java

2013-02-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
> But I feel a bit confused now regarding which changes require a a ticket > and which don't. Any modification that have impacts to our users, such as APIs change - in that case - a bug, a new feature, an improvement, ... worths an issue. Any trivial modification such as typos, missing javadoc, i

Re: svn commit: r1443186 - /commons/sandbox/beanutils2/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml

2013-02-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
> + > + Implement setMapped on DefaultBeanAccessor > + you can drop the `due-to` field in that case - I used the `due-to` field when you provided patches and I took the task to review and apply, since you worked on that `due-to` in no longer needed. It is like saying "Fixed by Benedi

Re: svn commit: r1443186 - /commons/sandbox/beanutils2/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml

2013-02-07 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Ciao Simo, 2013/2/7 Simone Tripodi > > + due-to="Benedikt Ritter"> > > + Implement setMapped on DefaultBeanAccessor > > + > > you can drop the `due-to` field in that case - I used the `due-to` > field when you provided patches and I took the task to review and > apply, since you wo

Re: mvn -Prelease deploy fails?

2013-02-07 Thread sebb
On 7 February 2013 05:24, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 02/06/2013 09:38 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 6 February 2013 20:15, Mladen Turk wrote: >>> >>> On 02/06/2013 07:26 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: >> >> >> Perhaps you managed to lock out your account? >> > > OK, I was able to upload using .zip file made manu

Re: mvn -Prelease deploy fails?

2013-02-07 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/07/2013 12:04 PM, sebb wrote: On 7 February 2013 05:24, Mladen Turk wrote: OK, I was able to upload using .zip file made manually from my local ~/.m2. So given all seems there are some serious infra problems with nexus. Well, I had no problems uploading a SNAPSHOT yesterday. However t

Re: [cli] release 1.3?

2013-02-07 Thread Mairtin Keane
Hi all, Just wondering if there was going to be a 1.3 release, is there any view on when this is likely to be? I'm keen to get the fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-145 Thanks, Máirtín From: Gilles To: , Date: 06/02/2013 16:36 Subject:Re: [cli] rel

Re: [Math] Moving on or not?

2013-02-07 Thread Gilles
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:46:55 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 2/6/13 9:03 AM, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:19:47 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 2/5/13 6:08 AM, Gilles wrote: Hi. In the thread about "static import", Stephen noted that decisions on a component's evolution are dependent on whe

Re: [cli] release 1.3?

2013-02-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Thomas! > looks like a new feature request to me and not a bug report. > > I would prefer to release 1.3 and then work on promoting cli2 to proper. I read the commit history and I think the component has matured enough, so it's time to cut an RC and let it be voted by the PMC. Thanks and cong

Re: [Math] Moving on or not?

2013-02-07 Thread Phil Steitz
On 2/7/13 4:58 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:46:55 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 2/6/13 9:03 AM, Gilles wrote: >>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:19:47 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 2/5/13 6:08 AM, Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > In the thread about "static import", Stephen noted tha

Re: [Math] Moving on or not?

2013-02-07 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:01:42 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 2/7/13 4:58 AM, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:46:55 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 2/6/13 9:03 AM, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:19:47 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 2/5/13 6:08 AM, Gilles wrote: Hi. In the thread about "st

Re: [Math] Moving on or not?

2013-02-07 Thread Phil Steitz
On 2/7/13 8:04 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:01:42 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 2/7/13 4:58 AM, Gilles wrote: >>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:46:55 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 2/6/13 9:03 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:19:47 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 2/5/1

Re: [Math] Moving on or not?

2013-02-07 Thread Konstantin Berlin
On Feb 7, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:01:42 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 2/7/13 4:58 AM, Gilles wrote: >>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:46:55 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 2/6/13 9:03 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:19:47 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: >>>

Re: [Math] Moving on or not?

2013-02-07 Thread Ted Dunning
Indeed. In fact, I have found threading of algorithms of very limited utility since I generally have parallelism at a higher level of the system and threading just gets in my way. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Konstantin Berlin wrote: > ... > Exactly. So why do this when cleaning up linear al

Re: svn commit: r1443696 - /commons/sandbox/beanutils2/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils2/Argument.java

2013-02-07 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2013/2/7 > Author: britter > Date: Thu Feb 7 20:13:23 2013 > New Revision: 1443696 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1443696 > Log: > Fixed checkstyle issues - no functional changes > > Modified: > > commons/sandbox/beanutils2/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils2/Argument.java > > Mod

Re: [Math] Moving on or not?

2013-02-07 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:32:46 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 2/7/13 8:04 AM, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:01:42 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 2/7/13 4:58 AM, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:46:55 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 2/6/13 9:03 AM, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:19:47

Re: svn commit: r1443696 - /commons/sandbox/beanutils2/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils2/Argument.java

2013-02-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
> How do you feel about this? Checkstyle complains about this, and I think it > is sufficient to tell users that an argument must not be null. sorry, which one? http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/

Re: [Math] Moving on or not?

2013-02-07 Thread Konstantin Berlin
Sorry, but not of this is making sense to me. We had a long discussion about how the library doesn't test for large scale problem performance. A lot of algorithms probably do not scale well as the result. There was talk of dropping sparse support in linear algebra. So instead of fixing that, you ju

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.13

2013-02-07 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 07/02/2013 06:37, Mladen Turk a écrit : > > Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.13 based on RC1 is ready. > It contains a fix for regression found in previous release(s). > > Binaries and sources for testing are at [1], dist layout is at [2], > generated site can be found at [3]. Tag is [4] which will b