To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On 01/11/2013 11:17 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:37:35PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 01/11/2013 11:15 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On 01/09/2013 11:18 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
Please have a look at the release candidate (RC1) for Commons
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-cli2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
On 12 January 2013 12:02, wrote:
> Author: erans
> Date: Sat Jan 12 12:02:15 2013
> New Revision: 1432412
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1432412&view=rev
> Log:
> Document update.
These instructions don't take into account the transition to svnpubsub
for dist/ and site which is due to
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Hi,
I would like to do a similar cleanup as for email also for logging and
aim for a 1.2 release in the coming weeks. The things I have in mind:
* update to Java 5
* comply to default maven structure
* update to Junit 4
* fix the open issues wrt thread safety
* replace WeakHashtable with a W
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Sounds good to me.
If Java 6 helps in any way, I would be OK with using it.
Gary
On Jan 12, 2013, at 9:04, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to do a similar cleanup as for email also for logging and
> aim for a 1.2 release in the coming weeks. The things I have in mind:
>
> * updat
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=25757&projectId=75
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 12 Jan 2013 15:20:20 +
Finished at: Sat 12 Jan 2013 15:20:33 +
Total time: 12s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=25762&projectId=132
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 12 Jan 2013 15:25:54 +
Finished at: Sat 12 Jan 2013 15:26:04 +
Total time: 10s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
Hi.
Please let me know what you think about
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-928
Use cases demonstrating advantages and drawbacks of the approach
are particularly welcome.
Thanks,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: d
On 01/12/2013 03:34 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
>
> If Java 6 helps in any way, I would be OK with using it.
Well, I wanted to be conservative, but Java 6 is also fine for me if
nobody objects.
Thomas
-
To unsu
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to do a similar cleanup as for email also for logging and
> aim for a 1.2 release in the coming weeks. The things I have in mind:
>
> * update to Java 5
> * comply to default maven structure
> * update to Junit 4
>
On 01/12/2013 05:37 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Neidhart
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to do a similar cleanup as for email also for logging and
>> aim for a 1.2 release in the coming weeks. The things I have in mind:
>>
>> * update to Java 5
>>
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> On 01/12/2013 05:37 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Neidhart
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to do a similar cleanup as for email also for logging and
>>> aim for a 1.2 release in the coming
2013/1/11 Olivier Lamy :
> 2013/1/11 sebb :
>> On 11 January 2013 17:29, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2013/1/11 sebb :
On 11 January 2013 16:22, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2013/1/11 sebb :
>> On 11 January 2013 14:32, wrote:
>>> Author: olamy
>>> Date: Fri Jan 11 14:32:58 2013
>>
On 12/01/2013 17:36, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Basically I am +1 on moving to newer JDKs. But in this case I just see
> use for old and older applications.
> That said, I just checked and saw tomcat is still using commons-logging:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/build.xml
>
> Ma
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/01/2013 17:36, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Basically I am +1 on moving to newer JDKs. But in this case I just see
>> use for old and older applications.
>> That said, I just checked and saw tomcat is still using commons-logging:
>> ht
Or log4j 2 for that matter?
Gary
On Jan 12, 2013, at 14:29, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 12/01/2013 17:36, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>
>>> Basically I am +1 on moving to newer JDKs. But in this case I just see
>>> use for old and olde
On 12/01/2013 19:29, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 12/01/2013 17:36, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>
>>> Basically I am +1 on moving to newer JDKs. But in this case I just see
>>> use for old and older applications.
>>> That said, I just check
Hello.
> Please have a look at the release candidate (RC1) for Commons Math 3.1.1,
> and vote.
Result:
Bruno P. Kinoshita +1
Matthew Webber +1
Thomas Neidhart +1 (binding)
Luc Maisonobe +1 (binding)
Phil Steitz +1 (binding)
Gary Gregory+1
The vote thus passed.
Re
25 matches
Mail list logo
