[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3 based on RC7

2013-01-07 Thread Oliver Heger
Build is successful on Windows 7 with both a JDK 1.5 and 1.7. Artifacts and site look good. The only issue I found is that the copyright date in NOTICE.txt is still 2012. However, because there have hardly been changes in 2013, I don't think that this is a blocker. So +1 Oliver Am 06.01.201

Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3 based on RC7

2013-01-07 Thread Gary Gregory
Does this RC take into account this whole publish to SVN thing for the site? Gary On Jan 6, 2013, at 17:26, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to call a vote for releasing commons-email-1.3 based on RC7. > > This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC6: > > +) add

Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3 based on RC7

2013-01-07 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Does this RC take into account this whole publish to SVN thing for the > site? > Well, no, but this migration could also be done post-release? Are there already instructions available how to migrate? I have just seen Olivier doing some work f

Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3 based on RC7

2013-01-07 Thread Gary Gregory
AFAIK, publishing to SVN requires that commons-parent be released. Gary On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > Does this RC take into account this whole publish to SVN thing for the > > site? > > > > Well, no, but thi

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-email (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[collections] commons collections 4.0

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Grünberg
Hi, we are using apache collections for several years. Now the requirements for generics are necessary for our development team. Is there any progress in the development for 4.0? What can we do to support the development? Do we have to solve the last 10 issues and then 4.0 is ready? Christian --

Re: [collections] commons collections 4.0

2013-01-07 Thread Gary Gregory
Any help is appreciated towards a new release. I think that some first steps would be: - get the latest trunk - make sure it all builds. make sure all the tests run - build the site - examine the reports: - if there are Clirr issues, consider what to do - fix RAT issues - fix PMD issues (add PMD

Re: [collections] commons collections 4.0

2013-01-07 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Christian Grünberg wrote: > Hi, > > we are using apache collections for several years. Now the requirements > for generics are necessary for our development team. Is there any progress > in the development for 4.0? What can we do to support the development? > Do we

[math] DiscreteEmpiricalDistribution

2013-01-07 Thread Phil Steitz
The EmpiricalDistribution class in the random package is designed to support large samples. It does not store all of data points in memory, but instead bins the data and uses smoothing kernels within the bins. I have recently had the need for a discrete empirical distribution - i.e., an implement

Re: [math] DiscreteEmpiricalDistribution

2013-01-07 Thread Ted Dunning
This will be very useful. Sampling from discrete ECDF's is also closely related to generating samples from a multinomial distribution. I did a bit of work on the latter problem. The result of that work is in org.apache.mahout.math.random.Multinomial The major difference that you will have is t

Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3 based on RC7

2013-01-07 Thread Gary Gregory
+1. I suspect we'll need another RC to deal with pub/svn when you actually try to do the release because the usual place we put sites is now supposed to be read-only. Gary On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to call a vote for releasing commons-email-1

Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

2013-01-07 Thread William Speirs
> > If the entire API is to change, then I agree one might as well treat > it as a completerly new library and change groupId/package name. > Users could either stick with the current design or rewrite to use the > new design. > I guess the question is, are you in favor of changing a great deal of

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp (in module commons-dbcp-1.x) failed

2013-01-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-email (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

Re: svn commit: r1430097 - in /commons/proper/compress/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/compress/archivers/zip: ZipEightByteInteger.java ZipLong.java ZipShort.java

2013-01-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi Julius, can you please record the changes in src/chanhes/changes.xml as well - and add yourself as developer to the POM if you feel like it? Thanks Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-email (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-01-08, Gump wrote: > at java.lang.Short.parseShort(Short.java:143) > at > org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.VersionCompatibility.getJUnitVersion(VersionCompatibility.java:40) ... > initializationError(org.apache.commons.mail.MultiPartEmailTest): Value out

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-chain2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issu

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbutils (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-07 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Hi, Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, > should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? Not sure about the differences of these 2, but I think we cannot release a stable version with a dependency to a -S

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-07 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/1/8 Christian Grobmeier : > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: >> Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, >> should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? > > Not sure about the differences of these 2, but I think we cannot > release a

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Grobmeier
> Do you know how to exclude some files/directories from the rat-plugin > scan ? Right now it includes .idea folder in the scan which produces > mass of errors :\ have not tried yet, but it supports an "exclude" option in the configuration: http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.