Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Thank you for doing another RC. > > While I was digging for a justification of the Clirr errors, I found this > in the release notes: "Clirr reports several errors for this release due to > moving constants from the Email class to the newly in

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Gary Gregory >wrote: > > > Thank you for doing another RC. > > > > While I was digging for a justification of the Clirr errors, I found this > > in the release notes: "Clirr reports several errors for this

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

On 12 December 2012 03:58, Gary Gregory wrote: > Thank you for doing another RC. > > While I was digging for a justification of the Clirr errors, I found this > in the release notes: "Clirr reports several errors for this release due to > moving constants from the Email class to the newly introduc

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

On 12 December 2012 13:17, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Gary Gregory > >wrote: >> >> > Thank you for doing another RC. >> > >> > While I was digging for a justification of the Clirr errors, I found this >> > i

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons Math -

Group (shared) Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Continuum-Build-Host: vmbuild X-Continuum-Project-Id: 97 X-Continuum-Project-Name: Commons Math Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/con

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons Math -

Group (shared) Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Continuum-Build-Host: vmbuild X-Continuum-Project-Id: 97 X-Continuum-Project-Name: Commons Math Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/con

Re: svn commit: r1420448 - in /commons/proper/email/tags/EMAIL_1_3_RC5: ./ conf/ src/changes/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/mail/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/mail/resolver/ src/main/java/org/a

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 12/11/2012 11:30 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 11 December 2012 22:00, wrote: > >> Author: tn > >> Date: Tue Dec 11 22:00:13 2012 > >> New Revision: 1420448 > >> > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1420448&view=rev > >> Log: > >> Cre

Re: svn commit: r1420448 - in /commons/proper/email/tags/EMAIL_1_3_RC5: ./ conf/ src/changes/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/mail/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/mail/resolver/ src/main/java/org/a

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:35:03PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: > > > On 12/11/2012 11:30 PM, sebb wrote: > > > On 11 December 2012 22:00, wrote: > > >> Author: tn > > >> Date: Tue Dec 11 22:00:13 2012 > > >> New Revision: 1420448 >

[Math] Preparing release 3.1

Hi. I'm going to start the steps of the release procedure, tomorrow or Friday, after the pending issues (MATH-874 and MATH-911) are resolved. There is one known compatibility problem (cf. messsage with subject "svn commit: r142"). Can it be solved by tomorrow? Any other blocking issues? Re

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons Configuration - Group (shared) Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=25469&projectId=72 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Wed 12 Dec 2012 18:19:02 + Finished at: Wed 12 Dec 2012 18:19:34 + Total time: 32s Build Trigger: Schedule Build N

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:06 AM, sebb wrote: > On 12 December 2012 13:17, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Thomas Neidhart > > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Gary Gregory >> >wrote: > >> > >> > Thank you for doing another RC. > >> > > >> > While I was d

Re: [Math] Preparing release 3.1

Le 12/12/2012 19:09, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > Hi. Hi Gilles, > > I'm going to start the steps of the release procedure, tomorrow or Friday, > after the pending issues (MATH-874 and MATH-911) are resolved. This are really good new! > > There is one known compatibility problem (cf. messsage

Re: [Math] Preparing release 3.1

Make sure you have all of your Checkstyle, FindBugs, and PMD ducks in a row ;) Gary On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 12/12/2012 19:09, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > > Hi. > > Hi Gilles, > > > > > I'm going to start the steps of the release procedure, tomorrow or > Friday

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

Hi folks, to avoid the full circles here * I hopefully fixed the binary compatibility issue, wrote test and also tested it with my production code * I moved the constants to EmailConstants because there are many constants and using an non-trivial implementation class (Email) to access a few

Re: svn commit: r1420448 - in /commons/proper/email/tags/EMAIL_1_3_RC5: ./ conf/ src/changes/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/mail/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/mail/resolver/ src/main/java/org/a

On 12 December 2012 15:42, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:35:03PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Thomas Neidhart > > wrote: >> >> > On 12/11/2012 11:30 PM, sebb wrote: >> > > On 11 December 2012 22:00, wrote: >> > >> Author: tn >> > >> Dat

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

On 12 December 2012 19:39, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi folks, > > to avoid the full circles here > > * I hopefully fixed the binary compatibility issue, wrote test and also > tested it with my production code > > * I moved the constants to EmailConstants because there are many constants > and us

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:47 PM, sebb wrote: > On 12 December 2012 19:39, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > to avoid the full circles here > > > > * I hopefully fixed the binary compatibility issue, wrote test and also > > tested it with my production code > > > > * I moved the cons

Re: [VOTE][CANCEL] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC4

Unfortunately I do remember ... :-( Siegfried Goeschl On 11.12.12 22:08, Mark Struberg wrote: we had this over here at UPC as well. This did cost Sigi a release as well if you remember ;) Most times this can be disabled by your provider. Just phone them and explain that they are breaking you

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

On 12/12/2012 08:39 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi folks, > > to avoid the full circles here > > * I hopefully fixed the binary compatibility issue, wrote test and also > tested it with my production code > > * I moved the constants to EmailConstants because there are many > constants and usi

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

Hi Thomas, there is some code out there using it to build emails based on maps https://turbine.apache.org/fulcrum/fulcrum-commonsemail/xref/index.html AFAIK we are free to drop deprecated stuff when doing a minor release - which of course breaks binary compatibility. Cheers, Siegfried Goesc

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 12/12/2012 08:39 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > to avoid the full circles here > > > > * I hopefully fixed the binary compatibility issue, wrote test and also > > tested it with my production code > > > > * I moved th

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > there is some code out there using it to build emails based on maps > > https://turbine.apache.org/**fulcrum/fulcrum-commonsemail/** > xref/index.html

Fwd: Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

Original Message Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:49:39 +0100 From: Siegfried Goeschl Reply-To: sgoes...@gmx.at To: Gary Gregory Hi Gary, just checked the Apache site and you are right - no way to remove a deprecated m

Re: We will not be able to update our websites...

At the very least, someone should file a Jira asking for a commons-test site. Ralph On Dec 10, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 12/10/12 5:10 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: >> On Dec 10, 2012, at 4:12 PM, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 10 December 2012 21:53, Phil Steitz wrote: On 12/10/12 1:27

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp (in module commons-dbcp-1.x) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp2 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-chain2 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issu

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbutils (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This