[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp (in module commons-dbcp-1.x) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp2 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-chain2 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issu

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[BeanUtils2] WeakHashMap is not a cache (?)

Hi, I just came across this post: http://www.codeinstructions.com/2008/09/weakhashmap-is-not-cache-understanding.html Now i'm wondering what you think about it, since we are using the WeakHashMap for BU2. Maybe we should be looking for an alternative caching mechanism? Any suggestions? Best regar

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbutils (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-vfs2-sandbox (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-vfs2-sandbox has an issue affecting its community integration. Thi

Re: [BeanUtils2] WeakHashMap is not a cache (?)

guten morgen Bene, I have not a strong opinion about it, I am convinced anyway that the original BU authors (BU2 at the beginning was a tentative to refurbish BU) adopted the WeakHashMap NOT with the purpose of implementing a `cache` in the strict sense we are used to. We should go back to the ML

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-sql (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-sql has an issue affecting its community integration. T

Re: [BeanUtils2] WeakHashMap is not a cache (?)

Apache OFBiz has a soft reference cache implementation. -Adrian On 8/13/2012 1:07 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: guten morgen Bene, I have not a strong opinion about it, I am convinced anyway that the original BU authors (BU2 at the beginning was a tentative to refurbish BU) adopted the WeakHashMap

Re: [BeanUtils2] WeakHashMap is not a cache (?)

Hi Adrian, any direct link? TIA! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > Apache OFBiz has a soft reference cache implementation. > > -Adria

Re: [BeanUtils2] WeakHashMap is not a cache (?)

Commons Collections has an LRUMap class that we could "borrow", perhaps? On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > guten morgen Bene, > > I have not a strong opinion about it, I am convinced anyway that the > original BU authors (BU2 at the beginning was a tentative to refurbish >

Re: [BeanUtils2] WeakHashMap is not a cache (?)

http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/org/ofbiz/base/util/cache/package-summary.html -Adrian On 8/13/2012 2:51 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: Hi Adrian, any direct link? TIA! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonet

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-vfs2-sandbox (in module apache-commons) failed

Hi All, Could this be because an old version of the JDK is used here? I compile with Orcale Java 1.6.0_31 on Windows 7 without issues. Gary On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Gump wrote: > To whom it may engage... > > This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For > more informat

[BeanUtils2] Working on mapped properties

Hi all, I've started work on mapped properties and just want to be sure, that I'm going in the right direction. I've had a look at BU1 and found the MappedPropertyDescirptor class. Now my plan is to adapt that class to BU2 and use it to build up the functionality needed to handle mapped properties

Re: [BeanUtils2] WeakHashMap is not a cache (?)

Hi, 2012/8/13 Adrian Crum : > http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/org/ofbiz/base/util/cache/package-summary.html > thanks for the input! As far as I understand the LRUMap seems to be more appropriate than a map using some sort of reference. But I'll have a look anyway! The LRUMap f

[lang] DurationFormatUtils formatPeriod

Hello, I just encountered an issue with DurationFormatUtils.formatPeriod() and here I suggest the patch. The problem is found when calcurating a duration between June 30 to August 8. Duration must be 1 month and 9 days (June 30 + 1 month = July 30, July 30 + 9 Days = August 8) but current logi

Re: [lang] DurationFormatUtils formatPeriod

Can you create a JIRA and attache a patch there? Thank you, Gary On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Naoya Sugioka wrote: > Hello, > > I just encountered an issue with DurationFormatUtils.formatPeriod() > and here I suggest the patch. > > The problem is found when calcurating a duration between Ju

Re: [BeanUtils2] Working on mapped properties

Hi Bene, sounds a good plan, go for it and we'll follow up the discussion once applying the the patch. TIA, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Benedikt Rit