To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
On 6 August 2012 04:58, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/5/12 6:44 PM, ma...@nimp.co.uk wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The gcd(int,int) method of ArithmeticUtils seems 2 times slower than the
>> naive approach using modulo operator.
>> Gilles tested the patch separately and found similar performance penalty.
>>
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
On Aug 5, 2012, at 11:21 PM, Dennis Hendriks wrote:
> See below.
>
> On 08/06/2012 12:49 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 12:54:11PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 8/4/12 10:57 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
Referring to this failed test (cf. message
See below.
Dennis
On 08/06/2012 02:48 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On Aug 5, 2012, at 11:21 PM, Dennis Hendriks wrote:
See below.
On 08/06/2012 12:49 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 12:54:11PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 8/4/12 10:57 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:48:14AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 5, 2012, at 11:21 PM, Dennis Hendriks wrote:
>
> > See below.
> >
> > On 08/06/2012 12:49 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 12:54:11PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >>> On 8/4/12 10:57 AM, Gille
On Aug 6, 2012, at 6:08 AM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:48:14AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 5, 2012, at 11:21 PM, Dennis Hendriks wrote:
>>
>>> See below.
>>>
>>> On 08/06/2012 12:49 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 12
Hi all guys,
I am prototyping the Jackson support as described in CHAIN-76 and
found an elegant solution with ServiceLoader to support, via Jackson,
multiple format support without hardcoding them in the ConfigParser
code but rather loading available parsers at runtime.
Since [chain2] hasn't been
I vote for going to Java 6. Java 6 is end of life in November, so it
seems a bit silly to support two end of life versions of Java. One
seems sufficient. That said - I may be breaking from the consensus
here at the Apache Commons.
-Elijah
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> H
+1 to upgrade to Java 6.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> I am prototyping the Jackson support as described in CHAIN-76 and
> found an elegant solution with ServiceLoader to support, via Jackson,
> multiple format support without hardcoding them in the Con
+1 for Java 6 as well.
Matt
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:59 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> +1 to upgrade to Java 6.
>
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>>
>> I am prototyping the Jackson support as described in CHAIN-76 and
>> found an elegant solution with Serv
Democracy wins, long live Java6! :)
thanks for the feedbacks!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> +1 for Java 6 as well.
>
> Matt
>
> O
> > [...]
> >>>
> >>> The RandomData class (or whatever it would be called) does indeed seem
> >>> useful. If we plan to keep it, we should probably make sure that there is
> >>> a sample/next/... method in that class for EVERY distribution, as some of
> >>> them are missing, if I remember corr
On 8/6/12 11:41 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>> [...]
> The RandomData class (or whatever it would be called) does indeed seem
> useful. If we plan to keep it, we should probably make sure that there is
> a sample/next/... method in that class for EVERY distribution, as some of
>
=== %< ==
Betreff: svn commit: r1369931 - in
/commons/proper/collections/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/collections:
keyvalue/ list/
Absender: tn-1odqgaof3lkdnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org
Datum: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:21:30 +
Newsgruppe: gmane.comp
On 08/06/2012 10:00 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
> === %< ==
>
> Betreff: svn commit: r1369931 - in
> /commons/proper/collections/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/collections:
>
> keyvalue/ list/
> Absender: tn-1odqgaof3lkdnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 12:44:24PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/6/12 11:41 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >>> [...]
> > The RandomData class (or whatever it would be called) does indeed seem
> > useful. If we plan to keep it, we should probably make sure that there
> > is a sample/n
On 8/6/12 2:28 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 12:44:24PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 8/6/12 11:41 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> [...]
>>> The RandomData class (or whatever it would be called) does indeed seem
>>> useful. If we plan to keep it, we should probabl
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 03:13:33PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The site build just hung on me due to
> BOBYQAOptimizerTest.testConstrainedRosenWithMoreInterpolationPoints
> spinning. A sample thread dump showing the spinning thread is show
> below. Above the reference to
> BOBYQAOptimizer.doOptim
On 8/6/12 2:53 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 03:13:33PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> The site build just hung on me due to
>> BOBYQAOptimizerTest.testConstrainedRosenWithMoreInterpolationPoints
>> spinning. A sample thread dump showing the spinning thread is show
>> below.
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:21:04PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/6/12 2:53 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 03:13:33PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> The site build just hung on me due to
> >> BOBYQAOptimizerTest.testConstrainedRosenWithMoreInterpolationPoints
> >> spinning
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-logging-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
Thi
Forward to commons-dev, as the reply was (accidentally?) only sent to me...
Dennis
Original Message
Subject: Re: [MATH] Test failure in Continuum
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 17:29:59 +0200
From: Phil Steitz
To: Hendriks, D.
On Aug 6, 2012, at 6:06 AM, Dennis Hendriks wrote:
See below.
On 08/06/2012 05:29 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On Aug 6, 2012, at 6:06 AM, Dennis Hendriks wrote:
See below.
Dennis
On 08/06/2012 02:48 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On Aug 5, 2012, at 11:21 PM, Dennis Hendriks wrote:
See below.
On 08/06/2012 12:49 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
26 matches
Mail list logo
