> If the patch
> doesn't make it into dbutil 1.5 we'll have the coverage for 1.6 ;-)
"release early and often" is a mantra that we should apply more... often :)
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-94 ;)
Bene
2012/7/17 Simone Tripodi :
>> If the patch
>> doesn't make it into dbutil 1.5 we'll have the coverage for 1.6 ;-)
>
> "release early and often" is a mantra that we should apply more... often :)
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apach
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
yes I already noticed it but not applied yet due to some stuff at
work, will take advantage from the lunchbreak to push a new RC :)
thanks,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Jul 17
More coverage would be gained also by removing all of the deprecated code.
Then again, probably best to schedule that for next major release (e.g.
2.0). Create ticket for this?
Regards,
Stevo.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> yes I already noticed it but not applied yet
yes, target it for 2.0 please - 1.X has to keep source/binary backward
compatibility
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Stevo Slavić wrote:
> More c
On 16 July 2012 22:58, sebb wrote:
> On 16 July 2012 21:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Hi All:
>>
>> With the addition of many new methods to the FileObject interface and other
>> TAR changes reported by Clirr [1], the next release will break BC for VFS
>> providers (those not provided by VFS itself.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi all guys,
I am opening the current [VOTE] thread to release Apache
commons-dbutils-1.5 based on RC2.
Release Notes:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.5/RC2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/dbutils/tags/DBUTILS_1_5_RC2/
Site:
my own +1
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> I am opening the current [VOTE] thread to release Apache
> commons-db
Simo,
Can you please list the changes between rc1 and rc2?
Gary
On Jul 17, 2012, at 8:09, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> I am opening the current [VOTE] thread to release Apache
> commons-dbutils-1.5 based on RC2.
>
> Release Notes:
>
>http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbut
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:08:51PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/16/12 5:17 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 04:39:41PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> On 7/16/12 2:46 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >>> Hi.
> >>>
> >>> Referring to the discussion here:
> >>> https://issues.a
Hi Gary,
Sure! Resolved the following issues:
[DBUTILS-94] Provide test coverage for org.apache.commons.dbutils.DbUtils
[DBUTILS-93] Source assembly artifact fails to build a site because of
missing pmd-ruleset.xml
Added also missing contributors in the related section on pom.
TIA for reviewing
+1
Bill-
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Simo,
>
> Can you please list the changes between rc1 and rc2?
>
> Gary
>
> On Jul 17, 2012, at 8:09, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
> > Hi all guys,
> >
> > I am opening the current [VOTE] thread to release Apache
> > commons-dbutils-1.5
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 05:16:30PM -0700, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I ask about trivial routines like isProbability(). Why is that any better
> than just saying
>
>Preconditions.checkArgument(p >= 0 && p <= 1);
>
> or checkState if it isn't an argument?
>
> I would argue that checkArgument i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 5:47 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 July 2012 22:58, sebb wrote:
> > On 16 July 2012 21:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> Hi All:
> >>
> >> With the addition of many new methods to the FileObject interface and
> other
> >> TAR changes reported by Clirr [1], the next release will bre
On 17 July 2012 15:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 5:47 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 16 July 2012 22:58, sebb wrote:
>> > On 16 July 2012 21:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> >> Hi All:
>> >>
>> >> With the addition of many new methods to the FileObject interface and
>> other
>> >> TAR ch
Don't you the following as disadvantages of the Preconditions way ?
* It forces you to write "p >= 0 && p <= 1" anytime. even it is a
trivial condition, you might mistake and get the inequality sign in
the wrong way, or forget the equals sign.
* You are depended on guava, and I guess you can't do t
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 17 July 2012 15:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 5:47 AM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 16 July 2012 22:58, sebb wrote:
> >> > On 16 July 2012 21:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> >> Hi All:
> >> >>
> >> >> With the addition of many n
+1 looks good Simo. Thank you for addressing my issues.
Gary
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> I am opening the current [VOTE] thread to release Apache
> commons-dbutils-1.5 based on RC2.
>
> Release Notes:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbu
+1
All looks good.
Oliver
Am 17.07.2012 14:08, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi all guys,
I am opening the current [VOTE] thread to release Apache
commons-dbutils-1.5 based on RC2.
Release Notes:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.5/RC2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Tag:
https://s
thanks to *you* Gary for having deeply verified all the produced
stuff, much more than appreciated!!!
all the best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Gary
Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> I am opening the current [VOTE] thread to release Apache
> commons-dbutils-1.5 based on RC2.
>
> Release Notes:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.5/RC2/RELEASE-
NOTES.txt
>
> Tag:
>
>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/common
On 17 July 2012 19:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 17 July 2012 15:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 5:47 AM, sebb wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 16 July 2012 22:58, sebb wrote:
>> >> > On 16 July 2012 21:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> >> >
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=23935&projectId=96
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Wed 18 Jul 2012 01:18:58 +
Finished at: Wed 18 Jul 2012 01:19:10 +
Total time: 12s
Build Trigger: Fo
Hi,
I have a forked a copy of vfs-cift to codehaus [1] to test it out. It
works so far for me.
What would it take to promote the current VFS's CIFT out of sandbox to
be released with VFS-2.x?
Thanks
-Dan
[1] https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/sandbox/vfs/vfs-smb/
---
29 matches
Mail list logo
