[Math] Toward releasing 3.0 ?

2012-01-25 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Among the good resolutions for this new year 2012, there had been rumours about releasing Commons Math 3.0 around mid-January. I've been reviewing the list of open issues and postponed several issues to 3.1 (mostly because there were no patch). Pending design issues (matrix interface, etc.

Re: [Math] Toward releasing 3.0 ?

2012-01-25 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi Gilles, > > It thus becomes urgent to tackle the remaining blocking issues. > Can we please make a list of those, and of all practical matters that > prevent the preparation of the release? > > > Thanks and best regards, > Gilles > As far as I'm concerned, I have been concentrating recently on M

Re: [Math] Proposal for a set of interoperable interfaces for mathematical structures

2012-01-25 Thread Axel
To extend JAS with the commons-math methods the easiest way is to extend the edu.jas.structure.AbelianGroupElem like this: public interface AbelianGroupElem> extends Element, FieldElement and add the methods: add() and getField() in all derived classes. But there's already an add() meth

[lang] What about Duration class? (org.apache.commons.lang.time)

2012-01-25 Thread Taras Ledkov
I'm very sorry if this problem has been solved in some way. But i found only discussions about duration & joda-time dated 2004. (http://markmail.org/thread/733yqv5zwzsngj3j) Now i really need in Duration functionality (especially such as Duration.parse(String)). I don't understand the Commons poin

Re: [lang] What about Duration class? (org.apache.commons.lang.time)

2012-01-25 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Am 25.01.2012 21:02, schrieb Taras Ledkov: I'm very sorry if this problem has been solved in some way. No need to be sorry, as everybody can see, you did some research on this topic ;-) But i found only discussions about duration& joda-time dated 2004. (http://markmail.org/thread/733yqv5zw

[SANDBOX][BeanUtils2] Unexpected behavior on Assertions.checkArgument(boolean, String, Object..)

2012-01-25 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, I'm refactoring AssertionsTest to match the discussed best practices. I wrote a test method for checkArgument(boolean Argument, String errorTemplate, Object.. errorArgs): @Test( expected = NullPointerException.class ) public void checkArgumentFalseStringNull() { checkArgument( false,

[configuration] RC for 1.8 release

2012-01-25 Thread Oliver Heger
Just a heads up: I am going to create a first RC for the 1.8 release soon. If somebody wants to add something which should be part of the release, so please let me know. Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons

Re: [Math] Toward releasing 3.0 ?

2012-01-25 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 01/25/2012 01:13 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > It thus becomes urgent to tackle the remaining blocking issues. > Can we please make a list of those, and of all practical matters that > prevent the preparation of the release? Hi, a release quite soon would also be appreciated from my side. As

Re: [lang] What about Duration class? (org.apache.commons.lang.time)

2012-01-25 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> But i found only discussions about duration&  joda-time dated 2004. >> >> (http://markmail.org/thread/733yqv5zwzsngj3j) >> Now i really need in Duration functionality (especially such as >> Duration.parse(String)). >> > I heard about joda-

Re: [lang] What about Duration class? (org.apache.commons.lang.time)

2012-01-25 Thread Matt Benson
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter > wrote: >>> But i found only discussions about duration&  joda-time dated 2004. >>> >>> (http://markmail.org/thread/733yqv5zwzsngj3j) >>> Now i really need in Duration functionality (es

Re: [lang] What about Duration class? (org.apache.commons.lang.time)

2012-01-25 Thread Gary Gregory
My view is to use joda-time. It is a full featured library. No need to reinvent the wheel. Gary On Jan 25, 2012, at 14:17, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Am 25.01.2012 21:02, schrieb Taras Ledkov: >> I'm very sorry if this problem has been solved in some way. > > No need to be sorry, as everybody can

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-01-25 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-01-25 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-01-25 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [lang] What about Duration class? (org.apache.commons.lang.time)

2012-01-25 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter > wrote: >>> But i found only discussions about duration&  joda-time dated 2004. >>> >>> (http://markmail.org/thread/733yqv5zwzsngj3j) >>> Now i really need in Duration functionality (es

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons Lang - Default Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)

2012-01-25 Thread Continuum@vmbuild
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=17818&projectId=95 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Thu 26 Jan 2012 07:44:14 + Finished at: Thu 26 Jan 2012 07:44:32 + Total time: 18s Build Trigger: Schedule Build N