Re: [DBUTILS] Test code still requires Java 1.6

2011-08-20 Thread Henri Yandell
Thanks. It was an unused import, so I've removed it. It also showed up in javadoc and I've fixed that too. Hen On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:00 AM, sebb wrote: > QueryRunnerTest imports java.util.concurrent.RunnableFuture which > requires Java 1.6 > > ---

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons DbUtils - Default Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)

2011-08-20 Thread Henri Yandell
Thanks :) On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:09 AM, sebb wrote: > Removed the definition as I see you are now aiming for 1.5 again. > > > On 19 August 2011 15:52, sebb wrote: >> Failure was due to requiring Java 1.6; the Commons Continnum default is 1.5. >> >> I've added a local build definition for DbUt

Re: [DBUTILS] Test code still requires Java 1.6

2011-08-20 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hello Why not using the animal sniffer plugin in the build ? -- Olivier Le 20 août 2011 09:56, "Henri Yandell" a écrit : > Thanks. It was an unused import, so I've removed it. It also showed > up in javadoc and I've fixed that too. > > Hen > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:00 AM, sebb wrote: >> Quer

Re: [DBUTILS] Test code still requires Java 1.6

2011-08-20 Thread sebb
On 20 August 2011 10:50, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hello > Why not using the animal sniffer plugin in the build ? Continuum already detects such issues, provided that the correct build profile is used. Seems like overkill to add another plugin. > -- > Olivier > Le 20 août 2011 09:56, "Henri Yandell

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-javaflow (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2011-08-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration. This is

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-08-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[configuration] Deprecate ConfigurationFactory?

2011-08-20 Thread Oliver Heger
In CONFIGURATION-459 the user guide has been re-written so that ConfigurationFactory is no more mentioned. Do we all agree that ConfigurationFactory should be deprectated in favor of DefaultConfigurationBuilder? Should we do the deprecation in the upcoming 1.7 release? Oliver --

[configuration] CONFIGURATION-427 - WAS Steps towards next release

2011-08-20 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 17.08.2011 00:04, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: Le 16/08/2011 22:27, Oliver Heger a écrit : Aren't we free to decide how to represent data structures in a configuration? I mean, the dot keys used by XMLConfiguration is also just a convention. We could transform a plist file to a XML-friendly struc

Re: [Vote] Release Commons VFS 2.0

2011-08-20 Thread Phil Steitz
On 8/18/11 9:25 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Commons VFS 2.0. > > Changes made since the last candidate: > > * Removed the sandbox project from the delivery, except for the web site. > * Updated README.txt to remove the existing text and add very basic build > instruc

Re: [Vote] Release Commons VFS 2.0

2011-08-20 Thread Henri Yandell
I'll try to dig deeper, but don't wait on me. On the website: This is a bad page. A user clicks 'examples' and gets a blank page (pretty much): http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/commons-vfs/site/commons-vfs2-examples/index.html Clirr reports would be nice to show the API change. You'll have t

Re: [Vote] Release Commons VFS 2.0

2011-08-20 Thread Ralph Goers
Notes below. On Aug 20, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > I'll try to dig deeper, but don't wait on me. > > On the website: > > This is a bad page. A user clicks 'examples' and gets a blank page > (pretty much): > > > http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/commons-vfs/site/commons-vfs2-examp

Re: [math] SimpleRegression

2011-08-20 Thread Phil Steitz
On 8/12/11 9:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 8/12/11 7:16 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> Before I chum the water with more JIRA tickets, I thought I would see >> whether people thought this was important. >> >> In the SimpleRegression you have two methods: >> >> public void addData(

Re: [Vote] Release Commons VFS 2.0

2011-08-20 Thread sebb
On 20 August 2011 21:54, Henri Yandell wrote: > I'll try to dig deeper, but don't wait on me. > > On the website: > > This is a bad page. A user clicks 'examples' and gets a blank page > (pretty much): > >  http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/commons-vfs/site/commons-vfs2-examples/index.html > > Clir

Re: [bcel] Backwards Incompatible Change to Visitor

2011-08-20 Thread sebb
On 17 August 2011 07:06, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > with svn revision 1158060 the bcel.generic.Visitor interface has become > package private, breaking the Gump builds of Xalan XSLTC, > commons-javaflow and likely other downstream code. > > Has this change been intentional? I don't think so.

Re: [bcel] Backwards Incompatible Change to Visitor

2011-08-20 Thread Dave Brosius
Sebb is right... my mistake... apologies, and thanks for the fix. dave On 08/20/2011 09:15 PM, sebb wrote: On 17 August 2011 07:06, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, with svn revision 1158060 the bcel.generic.Visitor interface has become package private, breaking the Gump builds of Xalan XSLTC, comm

Re: [Vote] Release Commons VFS 2.0

2011-08-20 Thread Henri Yandell
None were blockers btw. The only really important one is: >> Mention the package name change on the frontpage. Also that this means >> you can run both versions side by side. > > Did you read the News section? Isn't that clear? And the answer there is nope, didn't see it. Eyes weren't working. :