To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi All
I think it's been quite a while since the last commons validator release
(1.3.1 seems to date from 2006!). However, there have been quite a few bug
fixes since then, even if the refactoring into the routines package that
was the hope for 1.4 isn't quite complete.
I think it's probably
On 27 May 2011 16:46, wrote:
> Author: nick
> Date: Fri May 27 15:46:11 2011
> New Revision: 1128371
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1128371&view=rev
> Log:
> VALIDATOR-253 - Change the groupId for 1.4 to be org.apache.commons to match
> the new commons pattern, and add a redirect pom
On Fri, 27 May 2011, sebb wrote:
Or don''t fix the groupId until you have to change the package name for
some other reason, e.g. API breakage.
Ah, that's a pain. I'll put it back for now, as it's not the easy fix I
thought it was...
Nick
-
Release early, release often! :)
You have to call for a [vote] to be release manager IIRC.
Gary
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I think it's been quite a while since the last commons validator release
> (1.3.1 seems to date from 2006!). However, there have been
+1 for the beta, release early release often FTW!!! :P
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Release early, release often! :)
>
> You have to call for a [vote] to be release manager IIRC.
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri,
On Fri, 27 May 2011, Gary Gregory wrote:
You have to call for a [vote] to be release manager IIRC.
http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html indicates it can be done
with a lazy consensus, is that still correct?
Nick
On 5/27/11 12:34 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2011, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> You have to call for a [vote] to be release manager IIRC.
>
> http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html indicates it can
> be done with a lazy consensus, is that still correct?
Yes - and you are welcome to d
Rich Bowen just posted the slides from a talk that he gave called
"Write a Better FM" [1] (and why not to say, "RTFM"). There is
some great stuff in there that would help us improve our
documentation. Patches welcome!
Phil
[1] http://drbacchus.com/files/Write_A_Better_FM.pdf
-
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/27/11 12:34 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 May 2011, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> You have to call for a [vote] to be release manager IIRC.
>>
>> http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html indicates it can
>> be done with a lazy conse
On 5/27/11 12:59 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 5/27/11 12:34 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
>>> On Fri, 27 May 2011, Gary Gregory wrote:
You have to call for a [vote] to be release manager IIRC.
>>> http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html in
Hi Nick,
--- Weitergeleitete Nachricht (Anfang)
Betreff: svn commit: r1128448 - URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/validator/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/DomainValidatorTest.java?rev=1128448&r1=1128447&r2=1128448&view=diff
==
On Fri, 27 May 2011, Jörg Schaible wrote:
You should not use non-ASCII characters in source code. You have no
control over the OS encoding used for anyone else that checks out the
source (Subversion has no idea about encoding) or downloads it from our
tarballs. Always use \u encoding.
Tha
Hi Phil,
that is simply great!
(And that's really a shame for me living so far that I miss such
events with kind of awesome talk)
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Rich Bowen just posted the slides from a talk
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:06 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 26 May 2011 14:46, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote:
> SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, whic
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2011, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> You have to call for a [vote] to be release manager IIRC.
>
> http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html indicates it can be done
> with a lazy consensus, is that still correct?
Yup, lets go f
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:04 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 27 May 2011 16:46, wrote:
>> Author: nick
>> Date: Fri May 27 15:46:11 2011
>> New Revision: 1128371
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1128371&view=rev
>> Log:
>> VALIDATOR-253 - Change the groupId for 1.4 to be org.apache.commons to ma
On 27 May 2011 23:39, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 27 May 2011 16:46, wrote:
>>> Author: nick
>>> Date: Fri May 27 15:46:11 2011
>>> New Revision: 1128371
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1128371&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> VALIDATOR-253 - C
18 matches
Mail list logo
