To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
On Mar 10, 2011, at 8:47, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory
> wr
On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote
On 2011-03-10 15:01, sebb wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 201
Hi.
> >>> [...]
> >>> You are right, I am stupid. So we have to check for serializable.
> >>
> >> I don't see why: The serialization will work provided all "Object"
> >> arguments are "Serializable"; it is the user's code responsibility to not
> >> try serializing the exception when it knows that
On 10 March 2011 14:05, wrote:
> Author: erans
> Date: Thu Mar 10 14:05:32 2011
> New Revision: 1080231
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1080231&view=rev
> Log:
> MATH-542
> Added custom "writeObject" and "readObject" so that serialization can
> proceed even if non-"Serializable" objects
I am getting no action so far on:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3498 "Enable Nexus Access For
Commons Codec"
Can people interested in [codec] vote for it please?
Thank you,
Gary
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 15:01, sebb wrote:
> > On 10
On 10 March 2011 14:12, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 15:01, sebb wrote:
>> On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 1
I am getting no action so far on:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3498 "Enable Nexus Access For
Commons Codec"
Can people interested in [codec] vote for it please?
--
Thank you,
Gary
http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
http://garygregory.com/
http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
http:
On 10 March 2011 14:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I am getting no action so far on:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3498 "Enable Nexus Access For
> Commons Codec"
>
> Can people interested in [codec] vote for it please?
Patience ... the issue has recently been assigned.
> --
> Thank
I just saw that, yes. I am just making the ball keeps moving... :)
Gary
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:39 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 14:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I am getting no action so far on:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3498 "Enable Nexus Access
> For
> > Commo
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:19:23PM +, sebb wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 14:05, wrote:
> > Author: erans
> > Date: Thu Mar 10 14:05:32 2011
> > New Revision: 1080231
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1080231&view=rev
> > Log:
> > MATH-542
> > Added custom "writeObject" and "readObject
I'm abandoning this vote, because changes are needed to skin:
- logos now mostly have TMs, so need to change default
and parent
- don't claim Commons as a trademark
I'll start a new vote later.
If there are any other issues which have not been reported, please do
so ASAP so I can incorporate any
Hi Seb,
since we're discussing about it, I think it could be a good idea
distributing an artifact containing the assembly descriptors to
generate required binary packages for downloads, as described on[1],
and declare the assembly plugin directly in the commons-parent.
Components that need extra de
In [paren] v18, we have a nice trick to use maven-site-plugin 2.x with Maven
2.x and maven-site-plugin 3.x with Maven 3.x .
See
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin-3.0-beta-3/maven-3.html
If you want to look at the parent POM, look for:
maven-3
But, this does not work.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory
>>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:01 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On We
The "rc" profile doesn't seem to create the source/binary assemblies
any more. Not sure what's caused this, but for releases not using
Nexus this is an issue.
Niall
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:57 PM, sebb wrote:
> I'm abandoning this vote, because changes are needed to skin:
> - logos now mostly h
On 10 March 2011 22:24, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9
On 10 March 2011 22:32, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> The "rc" profile doesn't seem to create the source/binary assemblies
> any more. Not sure what's caused this, but for releases not using
> Nexus this is an issue.
AFAIK, that's not something that was changed between 18 => 19 is it?
When did it last
On 11 March 2011 01:43, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Fri Mar 11 01:43:28 2011
> New Revision: 1080421
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1080421&view=rev
> Log:
> Add maven-compiler-plugin with UTF-8
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/codec/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: commons/proper/co
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=4197&projectId=70
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 11 Mar 2011 01:56:22 +
Finished at: Fri 11 Mar 2011 01:56:39 +
Total time: 17s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Nu
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 March 2011 01:43, wrote:
> > Author: ggregory
> > Date: Fri Mar 11 01:43:28 2011
> > New Revision: 1080421
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1080421&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Add maven-compiler-plugin with UTF-8
> >
> > Modified:
> >
Hi Gary,
Gary Gregory wrote:
> In [paren] v18, we have a nice trick to use maven-site-plugin 2.x with
> Maven 2.x and maven-site-plugin 3.x with Maven 3.x .
>
> See
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin-3.0-beta-3/maven-3.html
>
> If you want to look at the parent POM, look for:
>
On 11 March 2011 01:17, sebb wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 22:32, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> The "rc" profile doesn't seem to create the source/binary assemblies
>> any more. Not sure what's caused this, but for releases not using
>> Nexus this is an issue.
>
> AFAIK, that's not something that was cha
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > In [paren] v18, we have a nice trick to use maven-site-plugin 2.x with
> > Maven 2.x and maven-site-plugin 3.x with Maven 3.x .
> >
> > See
> >
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin-3.0-be
Hi Gary,
Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> > In [paren] v18, we have a nice trick to use maven-site-plugin 2.x with
>> > Maven 2.x and maven-site-plugin 3.x with Maven 3.x .
>> >
>> > See
>> >
>> http://ma
This votes has passed with six +1 binding votes from the following people:
Jochen Wiedmann
Henri Yandell
Simone Tripodi
Phil Steitz
Luc Maisonobe
Jörg Schaible
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> +1
>
> Simone
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Jörg Schaible
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gary,
>>>
>>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>> > In [paren] v18, we have a nice trick to use maven-site-plugin 2.x with
>>> > Maven 2.x and maven-site-plugin 3.x with Mave
Stupid question: Is there any reason for not using the 3.x site plugin
with Maven 2?
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> In [paren] v18, we have a nice trick to use maven-site-plugin 2.x with Maven
> 2.x and maven-site-plugin 3.x with Maven 3.x .
>
> See
> http://maven.apach
33 matches
Mail list logo
