To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community
integratio
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Here's an alternative way to use Clirr with different packages:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-344
On 6 February 2011 15:39, wrote:
> Author: niallp
> Date: Sun Feb 6 15:38:57 2011
> New Revision: 1067685
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067685&view=rev
> Log:
> Create a c
I created a re-packaged version of Lang 2.6 so that we can produce a
more meaningful CLIRR report to see the real changes between 2.6 and
3.0:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1067685
I have refreshed the Lang site, with the clirr report run against that version:
http://
On 6 February 2011 15:55, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I created a re-packaged version of Lang 2.6 so that we can produce a
> more meaningful CLIRR report to see the real changes between 2.6 and
> 3.0:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1067685
>
> I have refreshed the Lang site,
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:55 PM, sebb wrote:
> Here's an alternative way to use Clirr with different packages:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-344
Yes thats better.
Niall
> On 6 February 2011 15:39, wrote:
>> Author: niallp
>> Date: Sun Feb 6 15:38:57 2011
>> New Revision: 10676
Just beat me; 2 hours before I got my script running again! :)
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/lang-clirr/lang-clirr-report.html
I'll keep that going for the moment as it might be useful to keep that
as a 2.x to 3.x diff once we're using the main one for a 3.x to 3.0
diff.
When releasing 3.