[VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2

2010-02-23 Thread Mladen Turk
Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the previous RC1 proposal. RC2 Release is here: http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/ Tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2/ If voted for a release the COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2 tag wil

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.5 based on RC3

2010-02-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > +1. Dist looks good. Sigs good, md5 good, clirr good, rat good, > changes-report seems good. > > Site shouldn't be deployed imo - sites should be deployed from trunk > instead of a branch (i.e. the 3.0 trunk is only going to get deployed > on

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-build-plugin based on RC2

2010-02-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:04 AM, sebb wrote: > On 20/02/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> The commons-build-plugin has been modified to improve the L&F and >>  cater for more than one release on the download page. >> >>  [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC2 >>  [ ] -1 No, because... >> >>  c

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC1

2010-02-23 Thread sebb
On 23/02/2010, Bill Barker wrote: > > > -- > From: "Phil Steitz" > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 5:58 PM > To: "Commons Developers List" > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC1 > > > > Mladen Turk wrote: > > > > > Aft

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2

2010-02-23 Thread sebb
On 23/02/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: > Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the > previous RC1 proposal. > > RC2 Release is here: > http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/ > Tag is here: > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2/ -1 becau

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2

2010-02-23 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/23/2010 01:04 PM, sebb wrote: On 23/02/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the previous RC1 proposal. RC2 Release is here: http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/ Tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMO

[RESULT][VOTE] Release commons-build-plugin based on RC2

2010-02-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
This vote has passed with three +1 votes from Niall Pemberton, Phil Steitz and Rahul Akolkar (and no other votes). Thanks everyone. I'll finish up the release shortly. Niall On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > The commons-build-plugin has been modified to improve the L&F a

[all] Preparing for commons-parent pom release

2010-02-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
I'd like to do a release of the commons-parent pom - primarily to upgrade to the latest commons-build-plugin 1.2 release. I have also upgraded the plugin versions and changed the "rc" & "release" profiles to now only produce the javadocs and not the whole site (this resolves a problem for multi-mo

Re: [all] Preparing for commons-parent pom release

2010-02-23 Thread sebb
On 24/02/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I'd like to do a release of the commons-parent pom - primarily to > upgrade to the latest commons-build-plugin 1.2 release. > > I have also upgraded the plugin versions and changed the "rc" & > "release" profiles to now only produce the javadocs and not t

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2

2010-02-23 Thread Bill Barker
-- From: "Mladen Turk" Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 4:08 AM To: "Commons Developers List" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2 On 02/23/2010 01:04 PM, sebb wrote: On 23/02/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: Daemon RC2 fixe

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2

2010-02-23 Thread sebb
On 24/02/2010, Bill Barker wrote: > > > -- > From: "Mladen Turk" > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 4:08 AM > To: "Commons Developers List" > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2 > > > > On 02/23/2010 01:04 PM, sebb wr

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-codec (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-02-23 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-codec has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [all] Preparing for commons-parent pom release

2010-02-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:07 AM, sebb wrote: > On 24/02/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> I'd like to do a release of the commons-parent pom - primarily to >>  upgrade to the latest commons-build-plugin 1.2 release. >> >>  I have also upgraded the plugin versions and changed the "rc" & >>  "release

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2

2010-02-23 Thread Bill Barker
-- From: "sebb" Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 5:44 PM To: "Commons Developers List" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2 On 24/02/2010, Bill Barker wrote: -- From

[codec] gump failure

2010-02-23 Thread Julius Davies
What's this about? Is this something we should take seriously? Forgive me, I'm new to gump (always ignored it). Julius On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Gump wrote: > To whom it may engage... > > This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For > more information please visit

Re: [codec] gump failure

2010-02-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2010-02-24, Julius Davies wrote: > What's this about? Is this something we should take seriously? It says commons-codec is no longer producing the jar Gump expects it to create. Gump uses something close to ant -Dcomponent.version=23022010 dist to build commons-codec and currently the res

Re: [codec] gump failure

2010-02-23 Thread Bill Barker
-- From: "Julius Davies" Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 8:52 PM To: "Commons Developers List" Subject: [codec] gump failure What's this about? Is this something we should take seriously? Forgive me, I'm new to gump (always ignored it).

Re: [codec] gump failure

2010-02-23 Thread Julius Davies
Thanks! Great info! On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Bill Barker wrote: > > > -- > From: "Julius Davies" > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 8:52 PM > To: "Commons Developers List" > Subject: [codec] gump failure > >> What's this about?  Is this s

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2

2010-02-23 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/24/2010 02:44 AM, sebb wrote: Are you sure they are all machine-generated? What application generates them? Note that I've not included the .rc files which have the heading: //Microsoft Developer Studio generated resource script httpd: Makefile.win, httpd.spec, Makefile.in ... tomcat:

Re: svn commit: r915668 - in /commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/nt: Makefile moni/Makefile service/Makefile

2010-02-23 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/24/2010 05:21 AM, billbar...@apache.org wrote: Author: billbarker Adding AL headers to files that look machine generated, but may not be. Nice, but I won't make another daemon spin just because of those. This is completely irrelevant. Everything we distribute is ASL licensed except where

Re: svn commit: r915668 - in /commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/nt: Makefile moni/Makefile service/Makefile

2010-02-23 Thread Bill Barker
-- From: "Mladen Turk" Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:05 PM To: Subject: Re: svn commit: r915668 - in /commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/nt: Makefile moni/Makefile service/Makefile On 02/24/2010 05:21 AM, billbar...@apache.org wrot

Re: svn commit: r915668 - in /commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/nt: Makefile moni/Makefile service/Makefile

2010-02-23 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/24/2010 07:25 AM, Bill Barker wrote: I think that we should declare this [VOTE] a failure, and anyone that wants commons-daemon can get it from SVN. Not necessarily. We need 3 +1 votes more then there are -1 votes. It's a release and release voting cannot be vetoed. It's just a number

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2

2010-02-23 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/23/2010 09:02 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: --- [X] +1 I support this release [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... Just for the record. Here is my vote. Regards -- ^TM - To unsub

Re: svn commit: r915668 - in /commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/nt: Makefile moni/Makefile service/Makefile

2010-02-23 Thread Bill Barker
-- From: "Mladen Turk" Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:39 PM To: "Commons Developers List" Subject: Re: svn commit: r915668 - in /commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/nt: Makefile moni/Makefile service/Makefile On 02/24/2010 07:25 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2

2010-02-23 Thread Bill Barker
-- From: "Mladen Turk" Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 12:02 AM To: "Commons Developers List" Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2 Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the previous RC1 proposal. RC2 Releas

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2

2010-02-23 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 02/23/2010 09:02 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the > previous RC1 proposal. > > RC2 Release is here: > http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/ > Tag is here: > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2/ > >