Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0

2010-01-23 Thread henrib
Dear Apache Commons community, The vote is extended till 2010-01-29. There are two +1 binding votes, Jexl only needs one more and 2.0 can be released. Thanks for your support (and votes). -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Jexl-2-0-tp1016004p1262764.html Sent fro

Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0

2010-01-23 Thread sebb
Unfortunately BUILDING.txt was not included in the release, but that's not a blocker, so: +1 On 23/01/2010, henrib wrote: > > Dear Apache Commons community, > The vote is extended till 2010-01-29. > There are two +1 binding votes, Jexl only needs one more and 2.0 can be > released. > Than

Re: [MATH] Remove unnecessary suite() methods from test classes?

2010-01-23 Thread sebb
On 23/01/2010, Bill Barker wrote: > > > -- > From: "sebb" > Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:21 AM > To: "Commons Developers List" > Subject: [MATH] Remove unnecessary suite() methods from test classes? > > > > > There are a lot of src/test cl

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2010-01-23 Thread Mark Struberg
Thanks Donald for pushing it! I'm not a commons guy, but I wait desperately for getting the agimatec stuff over to apache (already using it in a productive project). What about the package names? org.apache.commons.validator or e.g. org.apache.openvalidator ? It would be nice to know where t

Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0

2010-01-23 Thread sebb
I think there may be a problem with the pom.xml, as it refers to the RC6 tag: scm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0-RC6 scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0-RC6 http://svn.apache.or

Re: [MATH] Remove unnecessary suite() methods from test classes?

2010-01-23 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 23/01/2010, Bill Barker wrote: >> >> -- >> From: "sebb" >> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:21 AM >> To: "Commons Developers List" >> Subject: [MATH] Remove unnecessary suite() methods from test classes? >> >> >> >>> There are

Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0

2010-01-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 9:12 AM, sebb wrote: > I think there may be a problem with the pom.xml, as it refers to the RC6 tag: > >         > scm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0-RC6 >         > scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-01-23 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [MATH] Density functions for all continuous distributions gives rise to re-consider the HasDensity-interface

2010-01-23 Thread Phil Steitz
Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote: > Dear Community. > > I've just been going through all the continuous distributions in the > MATH-library to check which implemented the HasDensity-interface. > > Only the F-distribution, t-distribution, Weibull distribution, and > Cauchy distribution didn't implement

Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0

2010-01-23 Thread Phil Steitz
Nice work! Checked 1.5, 1.6 mvn build, sigs (using key from KEYS), hashes (only for .zip, .gz) jar contents, NOTICE and RELEASE-NOTES. +1 Phil > > Since there was only one +0 vote pending documentation updates, I went ahead > and published an RC6 correcting those. > So, this is now the vote fo

[codec] 1.4.1

2010-01-23 Thread Julius Davies
Hi, If anyone has any advice on how I can improve the patch I submitted for CODEC-89, or perhaps I can improve on Sebb's patch, I am more than happy to try. -- yours, Julius Davies 250-592-2284 (Home) 250-893-4579 (Mobile) http://juliusdavies.ca/logging.html -