[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons DBCP - Java 5 Ant build

2010-01-10 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=267250&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Error Started at: Fri 8 Jan 2010 06:29:25 -0800 Finished at: Fri 8 Jan 2010 06:29:34 -0800 Total time: 9s Build Trigger: Schedule Build

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons DBCP - Java 5 Ant build

2010-01-10 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=267362&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Error Started at: Fri 8 Jan 2010 10:52:02 -0800 Finished at: Fri 8 Jan 2010 10:52:09 -0800 Total time: 7s Build Trigger: Schedule Build

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons DBCP - Java 5 Ant build

2010-01-10 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=267398&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Error Started at: Sun 10 Jan 2010 07:29:15 -0800 Finished at: Sun 10 Jan 2010 07:29:24 -0800 Total time: 8s Build Trigger: Forced Build

Re: svn commit: r897678 - in /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/dbcp: TestConnectionPool.java datasources/TestPerUserPoolDataSource.java datasources/TestSharedPoolDataSource.java

2010-01-10 Thread Phil Steitz
>From the debugging added to some previously failed builds, I saw loop = 2 for some threads. Threads should not be looping. Second loop by a thread that succeeded the first time that throws will not change success state - so it looks like a success -> not enough failures. Phil pste...@apache.or

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons DBCP -

2010-01-10 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=267471&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Sun 10 Jan 2010 10:53:50 -0800 Finished at: Sun 10 Jan 2010 10:55:38 -0800 Total time: 1m 47s Build Trigger: Forced Build

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons DBCP - Java 5 Ant build

2010-01-10 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=267522&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Error Started at: Sun 10 Jan 2010 13:13:43 -0800 Finished at: Sun 10 Jan 2010 13:13:50 -0800 Total time: 6s Build Trigger: Forced Build

Re: svn commit: r897678 - in /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/dbcp: TestConnectionPool.java datasources/TestPerUserPoolDataSource.java datasources/TestSharedPoolDataSource.java

2010-01-10 Thread sebb
Thanks. Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the loopOnce parameter to PoolTest. It was quite tricky following the Continuum build output, as the date was 2 days behind, and the mail for the failed runs is not always accurate - if the "Exit code" is 127, then most of the

Re: svn commit: r897678 - in /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/dbcp: TestConnectionPool.java datasources/TestPerUserPoolDataSource.java datasources/TestSharedPoolDataSource.java

2010-01-10 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > Thanks. > > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the > loopOnce parameter to PoolTest. > > It was quite tricky following the Continuum build output, as the date > was 2 days behind, and the mail for the failed runs is not always > accurate - if the "Exit cod

Re: svn commit: r897678 - in /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/dbcp: TestConnectionPool.java datasources/TestPerUserPoolDataSource.java datasources/TestSharedPoolDataSource.java

2010-01-10 Thread sebb
On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > Thanks. > > > > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the > > loopOnce parameter to PoolTest. > > > > It was quite tricky following the Continuum build output, as the date > > was 2 days behind, and the mail for the

[dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-10 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > Thanks. > > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the > loopOnce parameter to PoolTest. I think I found (and fixed) another problem. See r897720. > > It was quite tricky following the Continuum build output, as the date > was 2 days behind, and the mail fo

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-10 Thread sebb
On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > Thanks. > > > > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the > > loopOnce parameter to PoolTest. > > I think I found (and fixed) another problem. See r897720. The wait in question is purely to allow the threads to star

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-10 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > Thanks. >> > >> > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the >> > loopOnce parameter to PoolTest. >> >> I think I found (and fixed) another problem. See r897720. > > The wait in question is purely to

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-10 Thread sebb
On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> sebb wrote: > >> > Thanks. > >> > > >> > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the > >> > loopOnce parameter to PoolTest. > >> > >> I think I found (and fixed) another p

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons DBCP -

2010-01-10 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=267564&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Sun 10 Jan 2010 15:13:35 -0800 Finished at: Sun 10 Jan 2010 15:15:26 -0800 Total time: 1m 50s Build Trigger: Forced Build

[DBCP] Continuum Java 5 build

2010-01-10 Thread sebb
It is starting to look like Continuum cannot handle mixed Maven and Ant groups, so perhaps it would be worth experimenting with a standalone group? Or perhaps work out how to use Maven to build with Java 1.4/1.5 (which would be useful anyway) ;-) I've tried recreating the failures using Hudson, b

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-10 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> sebb wrote: >> >> > Thanks. >> >> > >> >> > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the >> >> > loopOnce parameter to PoolTest. >> >> >> >> I think I foun

Re: [DBCP] Continuum Java 5 build

2010-01-10 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > It is starting to look like Continuum cannot handle mixed Maven and > Ant groups, so perhaps it would be worth experimenting with a > standalone group? That may be what we have to do. It doesn't make sense, since there is a "build environment" object that should determine what happe

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-10 Thread sebb
On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> sebb wrote: > >> > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> >> sebb wrote: > >> >> > Thanks. > >> >> > > >> >> > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the > >> >> >

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-10 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> sebb wrote: >> >> > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> >> sebb wrote: >> >> >> > Thanks. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I a

Re: [DBCP] Continuum Java 5 build

2010-01-10 Thread sebb
On 11/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > It is starting to look like Continuum cannot handle mixed Maven and > > Ant groups, so perhaps it would be worth experimenting with a > > standalone group? > > > That may be what we have to do. It doesn't make sense, since there > is a "buil

Re: [DBCP] Continuum Java 5 build

2010-01-10 Thread sebb
On 11/01/2010, sebb wrote: > On 11/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > > sebb wrote: > > > It is starting to look like Continuum cannot handle mixed Maven and > > > Ant groups, so perhaps it would be worth experimenting with a > > > standalone group? > > > > > > That may be what we have to do

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons DBCP -

2010-01-10 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=267625&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Sun 10 Jan 2010 18:15:28 -0800 Finished at: Sun 10 Jan 2010 18:18:03 -0800 Total time: 2m 35s Build Trigger: Schedule

Re: [lang] Divesting the commons.lang.math package

2010-01-10 Thread Paul Benedict
Without any further input (over a week), I say it's safe to divest. On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Henri Yandell a écrit : >> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: >>> This is how I believe the commons.lang.math package can be eliminated. >>> Based on the c