Guys,
I finally branched the code, I made a mistake during the import (I
copied into trunk/trunk) and I'm very sorry for that, but nothing was
broken.
So now on
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk
here is the current digester/trunk branch.
Thank you for your help, b
On 09/01/2010, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Guys,
> I finally branched the code, I made a mistake during the import (I
> copied into trunk/trunk) and I'm very sorry for that, but nothing was
> broken.
No problem - sandboxes are for experimentation after all...
> So now on
>
>
> https://svn.apach
Ok, going to fix it now, thanks!!!
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:46 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 09/01/2010, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Guys,
>> I finally branched the code, I made a mistake during the import (I
>> copied into trunk/trunk) and I'm very sorry for that, but nothing was
>> broken.
>
> No probl
Well, if you know that it is an array, you might check the compount type to be
a primitive and in case it is, you might use == for the primitive types.
--- Weitergeleitete Nachricht (Anfang)
Betreff: svn commit: r897419 -
/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=266904&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 7 Jan 2010 15:29:05 -0800
Finished at: Thu 7 Jan 2010 15:30:27 -0800
Total time: 1m 21s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build N
Any committers who would like to be able to kick off component
builds or otherwise mess with Continuum, let me know and I will help
you get set up.
I am sure the Continuum devs would also appreciate any spare cycles
that any of us have to help with the code. We use it, so...
Phil
-
On 09/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Any committers who would like to be able to kick off component
> builds or otherwise mess with Continuum, let me know and I will help
> you get set up.
Yes please!
[I'd like to be able to try some more DBCP builds]
> I am sure the Continuum devs would also
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:37 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 08/01/2010, sebb wrote:
>> On 08/01/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:51 PM, sebb wrote:
>> > > The overridable methods in DirectoryWalker currently use Collection
>> > > as a parameter type.
>> > >
>> > > As far
I don't have the possibility to access Continuum. I logged a bug in
September without it ever being addressed:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/REDBACK-247
Paul
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 2:56 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 09/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Any committers who would like to be able to kick off
On 09/01/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:37 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 08/01/2010, sebb wrote:
> >> On 08/01/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:51 PM, sebb wrote:
> >> > > The overridable methods in DirectoryWalker currently use
> Collectio
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:53 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 09/01/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:37 PM, sebb wrote:
>> > On 08/01/2010, sebb wrote:
>> >> On 08/01/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:51 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >> > > The overridable
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=267099&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 8 Jan 2010 00:33:12 -0800
Finished at: Fri 8 Jan 2010 00:35:04 -0800
Total time: 1m 51s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build N
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=267134&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Error
Started at: Fri 8 Jan 2010 01:49:48 -0800
Finished at: Fri 8 Jan 2010 01:49:57 -0800
Total time: 8s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=267154&projectId=156
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 8 Jan 2010 02:49:45 -0800
Finished at: Fri 8 Jan 2010 02:53:55 -0800
Total time: 4m 10s
Build Trigger: Schedule
14 matches
Mail list logo
