[digester] Re: Sandbox request

2010-01-05 Thread Phil Steitz
Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys and happy new year!!! > Time ago I submitted a proposal[1] to extend the commons-digester with > Java5 annotations and then submitted a patch[2] that has not been > applied; since I continued working on it, and since December I'm a new > ASF Cocoon3 Committer and

[DBCP] Continuum Java 5 build - please?

2010-01-05 Thread sebb
It would be very useful to have a Continuum DBCP build that used Java 5. The current build uses Java 6 only, so does not test JDBC3 compatibility. I don't have Commons Admin on Continuum (and I'm not very familiar with it) so please could an Admin add it? Thanks! ---

Re: [DBCP] Continuum Java 5 build - please?

2010-01-05 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > It would be very useful to have a Continuum DBCP build that used Java 5. > > The current build uses Java 6 only, so does not test JDBC3 compatibility. > > I don't have Commons Admin on Continuum (and I'm not very familiar > with it) so please could an Admin add it? > > Thanks! > I

Re: [DBCP] Continuum Java 5 build - please?

2010-01-05 Thread sebb
On 05/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > It would be very useful to have a Continuum DBCP build that used Java 5. > > > > The current build uses Java 6 only, so does not test JDBC3 compatibility. > > > > I don't have Commons Admin on Continuum (and I'm not very familiar > > with i

M2 SNAPSHOTS at repository.a.o WAS Re: FaltFile.jar @ us...@commons.a.o

2010-01-05 Thread Matt Benson
On Jan 5, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Matt Benson wrote: FWIW, there is a [flatfile] M2 snapshot published at repository.apache.org. Which should be definitely not there! Only official reelases can go to the repository. Does "the repository" == the Nexus instance at repo

[DBCP] Possible bug in PerUserPoolDataSource

2010-01-05 Thread sebb
It looks like there may be a bug in PerUserPoolDataSource. >From time to time, more than 10 of the threads acquire connections in the testMultipleThreads2() test case. I don't think this should happen, and it does not happen in the TestSharedPoolDataSource version. I've committed some debug code

Re: [digester] Re: Sandbox request

2010-01-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Phil, nice to meet you and thank you very much for your kind reply :) My apache id is simonetripodi, thanks in advance!!! All the best, Simone On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Hi all guys and happy new year!!! >> Time ago I submitted a proposal[1]

Re: [DBCP] Possible bug in PerUserPoolDataSource

2010-01-05 Thread sebb
On 05/01/2010, sebb wrote: > It looks like there may be a bug in PerUserPoolDataSource. > > From time to time, more than 10 of the threads acquire connections in > the testMultipleThreads2() test case. I don't think this should > happen, and it does not happen in the TestSharedPoolDataSource >

Re: [DBCP] Continuum Java 5 build - please?

2010-01-05 Thread sebb
On 05/01/2010, sebb wrote: > On 05/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > > sebb wrote: > > > It would be very useful to have a Continuum DBCP build that used Java 5. > > > > > > The current build uses Java 6 only, so does not test JDBC3 > compatibility. > > > > > > I don't have Commons Admin

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons DBCP -

2010-01-05 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=265895&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Sun 3 Jan 2010 17:45:32 -0800 Finished at: Sun 3 Jan 2010 17:47:52 -0800 Total time: 2m 20s Build Trigger: Schedule Build

Re: [jelly] Jelly site slow update

2010-01-05 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 05.01.2010 00:55, schrieb Paul Libbrecht: Hello developers, I took a little time to try to rebuild the site so as to answer the question of Oliver Heger on the commons-users mailing-list and it turned out to be less painful then expected. I uploaded a preview of the rebuild at: http://www.a

Re: [lang][collections] Overlap; Collections thoughts

2010-01-05 Thread Stephen Colebourne
There are many good points in this thread. My input is to try and outline where I have seen te boundaries. [lang] vs [math] - [lang] doesn't require a maths degree. [math] does. [lang] vs [functor] - [lang] doesn't require FP knowledge or religion. [functor] does. [io] - handles Stream, Read

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons DBCP -

2010-01-05 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=265972&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Sun 3 Jan 2010 23:49:34 -0800 Finished at: Sun 3 Jan 2010 23:50:30 -0800 Total time: 55s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Nu