Re: [configuration] Dependencies after switch to 1.4

I believe this could be addressed by changing the pom to only include Xerces and XML-APIs when compiling with JDK 5+ with a desired target of JDK 5+ and then having the unit tests that use validation only run when Java 5+ is enabled. However, this seems like a lot of work for little benefit sin

Re: [lang] Divesting the commons.lang.math package

Henri Yandell a écrit : > On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: >> This is how I believe the commons.lang.math package can be eliminated. >> Based on the current 3.0-SNAPSHOT API, there are only three classes >> left: >> >> Fraction >> IEEE754rUtils >> NumberUtils >> >> 1) Fraction

Re: [configuration] Dependencies after switch to 1.4

Henri Yandell schrieb: What would a dependency of 1.5 mean with regards to the Xerces dependency? You depend on Lang/Collections, and both are 1.5 dependent for their next version. With 1.5 the Xerces dependency is no more needed. There is some work going on for a Configuration 2.0 version wh

Re: [configuration] Dependencies after switch to 1.4

Ralph Goers schrieb: I believe this could be addressed by changing the pom to only include Xerces and XML-APIs when compiling with JDK 5+ with a desired target of JDK 5+ and then having the unit tests that use validation only run when Java 5+ is enabled. However, this seems like a lot of work for

Re: [lang][collections] Overlap; Collections thoughts

On Jan 2, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: I was thinking more that a smaller [collections] might have room for the functor code again - not that [lang] would :) Agreed that it's better out than in though. Th

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons Configuration -

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=265195&projectId=161 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Fri 1 Jan 2010 14:47:15 -0800 Finished at: Fri 1 Jan 2010 14:51:20 -0800 Total time: 4m 4s Build Trigger: Schedule Build

Re: [lang][collections] Overlap; Collections thoughts

Paul Benedict wrote: > Each if you split Collections into Maven children, you would still > wouldn't want to release them independently. That would be a gigantic > administrative error. Struts was thinking about doing the same thing > with its libraries, but we turned away from it -- THANKFULLY. Ho

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-vfs (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-vfs has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons VFS -

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=265231&projectId=171 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Fri 1 Jan 2010 17:35:09 -0800 Finished at: Fri 1 Jan 2010 17:39:23 -0800 Total time: 4m 14s Build Trigger: Schedule Buil

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

On 03/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 03/01/2010, sebb wrote: > >> On 02/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> > sebb wrote: > >> > > On 01/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> > >> Phil Steitz wrote: > >> > >> > sebb wrote: > >> > >> >> On 31/12/2009, Phil Steitz wro

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

sebb wrote: > On 03/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > On 03/01/2010, sebb wrote: >> >> On 02/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> > sebb wrote: >> >> > > On 01/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> > >> Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> > >> > sebb wrote: >> >> > >> >> On 31/12/