What do you mean it's "in the inheritance chain"? Since Junit 4,
inheriting from a JUnit base class is no longer necessary or desirable.
Those methods are static and are now imported statically. Likewise,
static imports would also be appropriate to use Spring's and Google's
validation code. Bas
I have three comments plus two nits below (search for strings
"Comment" and "Nit"):
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:17 PM, wrote:
> Author: henrib
> Date: Thu Nov 26 17:17:42 2009
> New Revision: 884650
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=884650&view=rev
> Log:
> JEXL-92: refactored JexlContext
Hello commons dev,
I proposed a lab over at labs in which to start construction of
something much like what commons-primitives describes itself as
setting out to do. The web page for primitives suggests a rather
dormant state. Is there anybody in there actively working on
primitives?
--benson mar
Benson Margulies wrote:
I proposed a lab over at labs in which to start construction of
something much like what commons-primitives describes itself as
setting out to do. The web page for primitives suggests a rather
dormant state. Is there anybody in there actively working on
primitives?
I thi
Repaired damage through revision 885553.
Hope this suits better.
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
> I have three comments plus two nits below (search for strings
> "Comment" and "Nit"):
> ...
>
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Re-JEXL-JexlContext-API-changes-in-JEXL-92-was-svn-co
Stephen,
It's interesting to me that the world in general knows about Trove,
but not so much this.
The fact that the front page is labelled with a snapshot version might
have something to do with it, but I am kind of mystified. One thing
that I'd like to add that Trove has is a full generic objec
Or you could start up a sandbox project. We've had good success with
ASF committers creating a sandbox branch of a released component, and
after diving in for a while it's then merged in to trunk where they
then become one of the most active coders of that component.
So +1 to a sandbox branch to p
Good idea, Henri. I'm +1 to that.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Or you could start up a sandbox project. We've had good success with
> ASF committers creating a sandbox branch of a released component, and
> after diving in for a while it's then merged in to trunk where
