Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

Niall Pemberton wrote at Montag, 12. Oktober 2009 23:33: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Oliver Heger > wrote: >> Are these issues release blockers? >> >> I'd say if the 1.8.0 release had the same issues, they are not. Otherwise >> they should probably be investigated. > > I just tested with

Re: [math] Questions about the linear package

- "Jake Mannix" a écrit : > Greetings, commons-math! > > I've been looking at a variety of apache/bsd-licensed linear > libraries for > use in massively parallel machine-learning applications I've been > working on > (I am housing my own open-source library at > http://decomposer.googleco

Re: [math] Questions about the linear package

- "Ted Dunning" a écrit : > I would like to add my voice as a Mahout committer. We would LOVE to > use > commons math in Mahout, but these and a few other issues prevent it. > > There was word some time ago about integrating a high performance > linear > package such as MTJ into math. Is

Re: [JELLY] Branch to prepare for JEXL-2.0 enhancements?

Hi all! Would you guys consider doing a 1.0.2 release any time soon too? Paul Libbrecht a écrit : Some people might even say the whole of Jelly is dormant, and indeed, I, Indeed, before seeing this thread I was about to send a "is-Jelly-dead?" probe message instead of this! ;) as many oth

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons Collections -

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=235863&projectId=160 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Wed 14 Oct 2009 08:53:39 -0700 Finished at: Wed 14 Oct 2009 08:55:29 -0700 Total time: 1m 49s Build Trigger: Schedule Bu

Re: [math] Questions about the linear package

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:32 AM, wrote: > > - "Ted Dunning" a écrit : > > > I would like to add my voice as a Mahout committer. We would LOVE to > > use > > commons math in Mahout, but these and a few other issues prevent it. > > > > There was word some time ago about integrating a high per

Re: [math] Questions about the linear package

Hi Luc, On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:01 AM, wrote: > > > > * also for RealVector - No iterator methods? So if the > > implementation is > > sparse, there's no way to just iterate over the non-zero entries? > > What's > > worse, you can't even subclass OpenMapVector and expose the iterator > > o

Re: svn commit: r825151 - /commons/proper/collections/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/collections/functors/NOPClosure.java

On 14/10/2009, mben...@apache.org wrote: > Author: mbenson > Date: Wed Oct 14 14:23:13 2009 > New Revision: 825151 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=825151&view=rev > Log: > [COLLECTIONS-341] > > Modified: > > commons/proper/collections/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/collecti

Re: svn commit: r825151 - /commons/proper/collections/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/collections/functors/NOPClosure.java

--- On Wed, 10/14/09, sebb wrote: > From: sebb > Subject: Re: svn commit: r825151 - > /commons/proper/collections/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/collections/functors/NOPClosure.java > To: dev@commons.apache.org > Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 12:56 PM > On 14/10/2009, mben...@apache.o

Re: [math] Questions about the linear package

Jake Mannix a écrit : > Hi Luc, > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:01 AM, wrote: > >>> * also for RealVector - No iterator methods? So if the >>> implementation is >>> sparse, there's no way to just iterate over the non-zero entries? >>> What's >>> worse, you can't even subclass OpenMapVector a

Re: [math] Questions about the linear package

Jake Mannix a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:32 AM, wrote: > >> - "Ted Dunning" a écrit : >> >>> I would like to add my voice as a Mahout committer. We would LOVE to >>> use >>> commons math in Mahout, but these and a few other issues prevent it. >>> >>> There was word some time ago ab

[VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.1 based on RC5

Hi folks, after many failures (and a lot of help) I have now the RC for commons-exec ready - the focus is to get a patch for the Exec Maven Plugin out of the door ... :-) Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/exec/tags/EXEC_1_0_1_RC5/ Site: http://people.apache.org/builds/common

Re: [math] Questions about the linear package

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > When this topic was discussed previously, Sam asked to someone called > Bjorn-Ove and the reply was positive, see > . > > Ok, so reading this thread left it at the following: 1) the maintainer

Re: [math] Questions about the linear package

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Jake Mannix a écrit : > > Hi Luc, > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:01 AM, wrote: > > > >>> * also for RealVector - No iterator methods? So if the > >>> implementation is > >>> sparse, there's no way to just iterate over the non-zero

Re: [math] Questions about the linear package

I think that Luc was referring to non-backwards compatible changes. Adding methods should not be in this category, but removing them would be. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Jake Mannix wrote: > Question about this: if RealVector is locked as an interface - no changes > until > 3.0 - and the