The distribution looks good. If you have to make a 3rd release candidate
you may want to add a test on setConfig() and setFactory() in
GenericKeyedObjectPool to improve the coverage. But don't hold the
release for this.
Emmanuel Bourg
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Thanks to all who provided feedba
ss
Hi!
>> http://gaevfs.appspot.com/
cool stuff!
> This is kind of cool. My first thought was that it might be nice to
> include it in VFS itself, but after looking at
> http://code.google.com/appengine/terms.html
> I have my doubts that including this at Apache would be doable even
> as a
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
>
> Changes in RC2
>
> * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
> * Restored development reports
> * Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests -
> thanks, sebb!
> * Added link to release javadoc in site.xml
>
Emmanuel,
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 23:38 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> James Ring a écrit :
>
> > I think partial matching should be disabled by default. While a neat
> > feature to reduce typing, this behaviour will probably come as a
> > surprise to people because it is not found in most programs
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
Hello,
Suppose I wanted to make a proposal for something to be included in Commons,
is there any particular way I should go about it, or should I just post it
in this forum?
Thanks,
Chris
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-make-a-proposal-tp23802008p23802008.html
Se
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
>
> Changes in RC2
>
> * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
> * Restored development reports
> * Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests -
> thanks, sebb!
Unfortunately not enough, see be
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
> >
> > Changes in RC2
> >
> > * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
> > * Restored development reports
> > * Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
Changes in RC2
* Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
* Restored development reports
* Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests -
thanks, sebb!
* Added link to release javadoc in si
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
> > >
> > > Changes in RC2
> > >
> > > * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
> > > * Restored development reports
> > > * Improved thr
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
Changes in RC2
* Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
* Restored development reports
* Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests -
thanks, sebb!
Unfortunately not enou
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
> >
> > Changes in RC2
> >
> > * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
> > * Restored development reports
> > * Improved thr
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
> > >
> > > Changes in RC2
> > >
> > > * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
> > > * Restored development reports
> > > * Improved thread-safety and
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > > > Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes in RC2
> > > > >
> > > > > * Fixed c
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
Changes in RC2
* Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
* Restored development reports
* Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability i
On May 31, 2009, at 2:44 AM, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
There is no need to add this to VFS's providers.xml as a vfs plugin
is able to provides its own vfs-providers.xml [1] which will be
loaded by VFS then automatically.
Thanks for reminding me. Then I wonder what the requirement that th
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> > > sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes in RC2
s...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks!
-for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+for (int i = 0; i < smallPrimes.length; i++) {
pool.setNumTestsPerEvictionRun(smallPrimes[i]);
-for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) {
+for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) { // TODO why 5?
No
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> s...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Thanks!
>
> > -for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> > +for (int i = 0; i < smallPrimes.length; i++) {
> >
> pool.setNumTestsPerEvictionRun(smallPrimes[i]);
> > -for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) {
> > +fo
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
s...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks!
-for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+for (int i = 0; i < smallPrimes.length; i++) {
pool.setNumTestsPerEvictionRun(smallPrimes[i]);
-for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) {
+
There are two reasons for this:
1. GAE does not set the "os.arch" or "os.version" system properties.
When Commons VFS initializes, it tries to do this (OS.java line 36), which
throws NullPointerExceptions:
* private* *static* *final* String *OS_ARCH* = System.*getProperty*(
"os.arch").toLow
I would be very happy if you could reference it from the Commons VFS web
site as a 3rd party plug-in. (Yes, the GaeVFS jar does contain a
vfs-providers.xml configuration, so there's no need to add it to
providers.xml).
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On May 30, 2009, at 2:5
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > sebb wrote:
> >
> > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > sebb wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thank
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> > > sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks to all who p
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > > sebb wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > sebb wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
Just tried testing GKOP using Java 1.6:
java version "1.6.0_13"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_13-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 11.3-b02, mixed mode, sharing)
and I got yet another different error:
---
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > sebb wrote:
> >
> > > On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > > > sebb wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
sebb wrote:
Just tried testing GKOP using Java 1.6:
java version "1.6.0_13"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_13-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 11.3-b02, mixed mode, sharing)
and I got yet another different error:
-
It kind of depends on what you're proposing... a new component? Probably start
a discussion on this list. Enhancements to an existing component? Either
start here on the list or open a JIRA issue.
Does this help?
-Matt
--- On Sun, 5/31/09, chris0 wrote:
> From: chris0
> Subject: How to
Phil Steitz wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> > > sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > Just tried testing GKOP using Java 1.6:
> >
> > java version "1.6.0_13"
> > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_13-b03)
> > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 11.3-b02, mixed mode, sharing)
> >
> > and I got yet another different error:
Great work man.!!!
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
> The first public release (0.1) of GaeVFS is now available:
>
>http://gaevfs.appspot.com/
>
> GaeVFS is a plug-in for Apache Commons VFS that implements a virtual file
> system on top of the Google App Engine for Java
This should have gone to the dev list.
On May 31, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On May 31, 2009, at 9:24 AM, chris0 wrote:
Hello,
I'm making this proposal because I couldn't find a good solution to a
problem that I recently had.
What I wanted to do was to configure an application
35 matches
Mail list logo
